I could not watch the whole thing. His talking style or something
gives me the DTs.
Both he and Jonathan were incorrect about the CV death toll on the day of the interview (August 3). The death toll on August 2 was around 158,000. Jonathan said 145,000 at one point, and OCP said 140,000.
But most of the interview was pretty much fact free from my perspective (I could not watch, but I skimmed the transcript (and even that was difficult to parse)). When OCP says things like "People are saying", or "They say", he has almost never backed that up with anything concrete.
To me, paying much (or any) attention to what he says is just an exercise in distractions and outrageous statements. It sure shortens watching the news when you can skip over those parts.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
I watched the whole interview. It was not the unmitigated disaster the laft clams. He is not very good at speaking off the cuff about things that can be refuted, but the things he said were, for the most part, literally true if you parse the sentence.Of course he does not have a filter and doesn’t care who he offends with thoughtless remarks. But if you take the stuff he said sentence by sentence, word by word there are legit, logical and true explanations. The problem is he parrots and regurgitates things his advisors tell him but he flubs them up in the retelling. I actually got a kick out of them talking over each other. I would have had a bit more respect for the president if I was interviewing them but obviously these two have a history and enjoy the jousting.He was pretty uncaring about John Lewis, but if John Lewis snubbed him at the inauguration and state of the unions, if John Lewis really had a deep dislike for Trump, it is not surprising that Trump didn’t have much personal knowledge of the guy. When asked if Lewis was impressive (not sure the exact wording) Trump essentially said “I don’t know, others seem to think so”. That is not Trump saying Lewis was not impressive or discounting his accomplishments, but that is how it was interpreted by some news outlets.It seems we have a bunch of 13 year olds that summarize current events and create headlines. They lack the ability, or tenacity or authority to attempt to report exactly what has been said, rather they just report the worst possibly way you can take/spin a statement. On both sides.You see an inflammatory head line, look at the story and see the reactionary summary and then go actually read or view the source and it is never as bad.But if it bleeds it leads. Not much has changed there. Newspaper articles 200 years ago were doing the exact same thing to political enemies. Even worse as far as slander and libel.Don't start...I'll post Axios interview from most inept president ever. What an embarrassment.On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 4:23 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
--Antifa laser.Person behind holding the object. DebunkedOn Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 2:55 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
--Looks like a mirage to me.
bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>On 8/5/2020 1:47 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
Ha...my friend is analyzing it...he has cool toys and software plus expertise.On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 2:02 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
--That’s what covid looks like in the wild.Intriguing...not a lens flare
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
