Are you pre-defining blocks, though? 

Inside IP       Outside IP/Port range 
100.64.1.1      2.2.2.2:2000-2099 
100.64.1.2      2.2.2.2:2100-2199 
100.64.1.3      2.2.2.2:2200-2299 
I'd do more than 100 ports, but table is just meant to express the concept. 


Then you ALWAYS know IP:port to internal IP matching, without having to track 
anything. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Christopher Tyler" <ch...@totalhighspeed.net> 
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> 
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 12:07:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issue with Google 

That is how we are doing it for the most part. We still have a lot of old 
172.16.0.0/12 addresses that need to be converted to 100.64.0.0/10. We have 
been and still are steadily working towards that goal though. 

-- 
Christopher Tyler 
Senior Network Engineer 
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE 

Total Highspeed Internet Solutions 
1091 W. Kathryn Street 
Nixa, MO 65714 
(417) 851-1107 x. 9002 
www.totalhighspeed.com 

----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "afmug" <af...@ics-il.net> 
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> 
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 12:00:18 PM 
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issue with Google 

> If you're NATing multiple customers behind a single IP address, do it this 
> way: 
> 
> 
> [ 
> https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Firewall/NAT#Carrier-Grade_NAT_.28CGNAT.29_or_NAT444
>  
> | 
> https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Firewall/NAT#Carrier-Grade_NAT_.28CGNAT.29_or_NAT444
>  
> ] 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- 
> Mike Hammett 
> [ http://www.ics-il.com/ | Intelligent Computing Solutions ] 
> [ https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL ] [ 
> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb ] [ 
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions ] [ 
> https://twitter.com/ICSIL ] 
> [ http://www.midwest-ix.com/ | Midwest Internet Exchange ] 
> [ https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix ] [ 
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange ] [ 
> https://twitter.com/mdwestix ] 
> [ http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/ | The Brothers WISP ] 
> [ https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp ] [ 
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg ] 
> 
> From: "Christopher Tyler" <ch...@totalhighspeed.net> 
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> 
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 11:46:07 AM 
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issue with Google 
> 
> Yes, NAT is in play here, I just now increased the NAT pool to 128 addresses 
> based on TJ's theory that the NAT pool might be too small. 
> 
> The source IP's seem to be spoofed or proxied somehow as the first IP address 
> in 
> the list from Google is our ARIN /20 Network address (x.x.0.0) and I find it 
> hard to believe that our gateway router is scraping Google for content. 
> 
> -- 
> Christopher Tyler 
> Senior Network Engineer 
> MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE 
> 
> Total Highspeed Internet Solutions 
> 1091 W. Kathryn Street 
> Nixa, MO 65714 
> (417) 851-1107 x. 9002 
> www.totalhighspeed.com 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "afmug" <af...@ics-il.net> 
>> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> 
>> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 11:37:58 AM 
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issue with Google 
> 
>> You have the source IP, port, and time. What more do you need to determine 
>> who's 
>> doing it? 
>> 
>> I'm assuming you're NATing customers at the router in question. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- 
>> Mike Hammett 
>> [ http://www.ics-il.com/ | Intelligent Computing Solutions ] 
>> [ https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL ] [ 
>> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb ] [ 
>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions ] [ 
>> https://twitter.com/ICSIL ] 
>> [ http://www.midwest-ix.com/ | Midwest Internet Exchange ] 
>> [ https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix ] [ 
>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange ] [ 
>> https://twitter.com/mdwestix ] 
>> [ http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/ | The Brothers WISP ] 
>> [ https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp ] [ 
>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg ] 
>> 
>> From: "Christopher Tyler" <ch...@totalhighspeed.net> 
>> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> 
>> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 10:59:30 AM 
>> Subject: [AFMUG] Issue with Google 
>> 
>> So the other day we got an email (excerpt below) from Google's automated 
>> tool... 
>> 
>> We are seeing automated scraping of Google Web Search from a large 
>> number of your IPs. Automated scraping violates our /robots.txt file 
>> and also our Terms of Service. We request that you terminate this 
>> traffic immediately. Failure to do so may cause your network to be 
>> blocked by our abuse systems. 
>> 
>> To allow you to identify the traffic, we are providing a list of 
>> your IPs they used today (Source field), as well as the most common 
>> destination (Google) IP and port and a timestamp of a recent request 
>> (in UTC) to aid in your identification. Note that this list may not 
>> be exhaustive, and we request that you terminate all such traffic, not 
>> just traffic from IPs in this list. 
>> 
>> All of the destination ports (to Google) are either 80 or 443, so they at 
>> least 
>> appear to be legit web traffic on the surface. They are obviously spoofed IP 
>> address as there are network addresses in the list and the IP belongs to a 
>> router that doesn't appear to be compromised in any way. The initial letter 
>> included 700+ IP addresses from our network. 
>> 
>> It's now affecting our customers as they are now getting Captcha's for every 
>> couple of Google searches that they perform. 
>> 
>> Does anyone know of a good way to track the perpetrator(s) down and/or know 
>> of a 
>> way to mitigate this? 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Christopher Tyler 
>> Senior Network Engineer 
>> MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE 
>> 
>> Total Highspeed Internet Solutions 
>> 1091 W. Kathryn Street 
>> Nixa, MO 65714 
>> (417) 851-1107 x. 9002 
>> www.totalhighspeed.com 
>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list 
>> AF@af.afmug.com 
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list 
>> AF@af.afmug.com 
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list 
> AF@af.afmug.com 
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> 
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list 
> AF@af.afmug.com 
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to