With the restriction of "unlicensed" that's an absolute fact.
If we really didn't care what it costs there are LTE systems that'll do
more.
On 6/16/2020 11:38 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
PMP450m
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *fiber...@mail.com
*To: *af@af.afmug.com
*Sent: *Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:36:28 AM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] Wireless state of the art?
Hi all!
What's currently the money-is-no-object, perfect line of sight, state
of the art wireless setup which will give the maximum sustained
throughput per sector and tower using sub-60 Ghz unlicensed
frequencies in a point-to-multipoint topology?
Jared
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
