That was the logic behind portable phones going from 0.9 GHz to 2.4 GHz to 5.8GHz, then finally DECT 6. 0.9 GHz probably would have been the best option because it had the most range, but got trashed with baby monitors, wireless weather stations and smart meters. DECT 6 actually work pretty well, but not because it's one more than 5, but because it occupied the sweet spot between 0.9GHz and 2.4GHz.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 4/23/2020 10:22 AM, Cameron Crum
wrote:
Don't you love it when non-technical people write articles? "It spans the 6GHz frequency range, which means it’s much faster than both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi". Wow I didn't know radio waves got faster with higher frequency. Now, I can see how more bandwidth would allow more throughput, but faster because it's in 6GHz just doesn't cut the mustard. And we wonder why so many people believe 5G is killing us...
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:45 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
That's awesome a 36 inch ball to bounce through a 32 inch door. Great for the room you're in with it
--On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 8:12 AM Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
--Oh. Cool. Even less penetration through walls.
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
