FWIW I'd say we're at 99% success with link tests. Maybe an error here or there that I can't recall, but otherwise it's massively reliable.
On the flip side the Ubnt test wouldn't work if either side was up for too long, so maybe I got used to that and anything that worked when I asked it to is such a refreshing change of pace. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:10 PM Steven Kenney <st...@wavedirect.org> wrote: > No QOS in the AP's or SM's for ePMP. > > Its like we get a random bad batch of them that don't like speed tests. > > -- > Steven Kenney > Network Operations Manager > WaveDirect Telecommunications > http://www.wavedirect.net > (519)737-WAVE (9283) > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com> > *To: *"af" <af@af.afmug.com> > *Sent: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 2:59:09 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Speed Tests > > If you are using the QOS in the AP, I think the linktest will only use > what is not already consumed by the SM. It's not intrusive like the > FSK/450 test was. > > On an SM with no other traffic, I always see the linktest to be what the > QOS is set to. > > I have just started upgrading sites to 4.4.3, and have some EPMP3000 AP's > out there. Randomly now, I will have an sm return 'linktest failed' when > testing an EPMP1000SM to and EPMP3000 AP. Then the next text will work > fine. > > On 4/2/2020 1:53 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote: > > This has not been our experience. We do not rate-limit at the SM. We > primarily rate-limit PPPoE at the core. We've found that our speedtest are > usually 10-15% below the linktest results. > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:30 PM Steven Kenney <st...@wavedirect.org> wrote: > >> No example we'll get link tests at 80Mbps or higher and then their >> package is set to 25Mbps. We can see they are doing 20Mbps during the >> evenings etc. But when we go do a speed test anywhere it'll be 8 no matter >> what. >> >> I've confirmed the shaping of their connection is set to 100% to be >> sure. >> >> -- >> Steven Kenney >> Network Operations Manager >> WaveDirect Telecommunications >> http://www.wavedirect.net >> (519)737-WAVE (9283) >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Josh Luthman" < <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> *To: *"af" <af@af.afmug.com> >> *Sent: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 2:23:59 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Speed Tests >> >> Linktest you mean? I've found it's 10% within TCP/UDP capacity. >> I'm exclusively 3.5.6 on epmp1000/2000 - no 4.x yet >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:07 PM Steven Kenney < <st...@wavedirect.org> >> st...@wavedirect.org> wrote: >> >>> Anyone have issues with certain model ePMP's not being able to get their >>> speed tests? Even though their link tests are fine and more than capable, >>> and we see customers traffic going much higher than the speed tests! It >>> won't matter where we run the speed tests, they are always low. >>> >>> It only seems to be a handful of epmp radios. Not all. Mainly on 4.4.3 >>> firmware. >>> >>> We have been scratching our heads on this one. >>> >>> -- >>> Steven Kenney >>> Network Operations Manager >>> WaveDirect Telecommunications >>> http://www.wavedirect.net >>> (519)737-WAVE (9283) >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
