I think that this is only about the RB4011 hardware.
There were reports in the MikroTik forum about some users experiencing
lockups on RB4011 - more than I have seen with other models. I had opened a
support ticket with MikroTik asking if there was some kind of hardware
lockup issue with the RB4011 (as we need to deploy one in a hard-to-access
location and the RB4011 is the only small-size, high-port-count router that
they have with good performance). MikroTik replied that they haven't seen a
notable lockup issue with that model.
I suspect that there's a very rare issue that they haven't found yet so for
my purposes I'm looking at using a RB450Gx4 and switch.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 11:37 AM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Our home router is on 6.46.2, and is doing NAT. It is an RB493 however.
> No lockups or anything unusual.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 3/7/2020 9:23 AM, Nate Burke wrote:
> > This week I've had 2 RB4011 Routers lockup requiring a power cycle.
> > They were still passing some traffic, but stopped doing things like
> > handing out DHCP, or responding to SNMP. And you couldn't log into
> > them via Winbox or MACNeighbor.
> >
> > One was on ROS6.44.3, the other on ROS6.45. Both of them were doing
> > NAT, whereas most of my Mikrotiks are only routing. Both of these
> > locations have multiple RB4011s, and only the one doing NAT locked
> > up. Nothing is recorded in the log other than the reboot. These were
> > both routers that have been installed for months. One router lockup I
> > can attribute to a fluke, but 2 in the same week is worrysome. Has
> > any one else noticed anything?
> >
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
