This has to be some of the worst peering I’ve ever seen. Does anyone know why they would be routing like this?
From the Outer Banks: Traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 64 hops max. 1 192.168.4.1 (192.168.4.1) time=7 ms 2 71-11-89-73.static.hlrg.nc.charter.com (71.11.89.73) time=7 ms 3 150.181.7.224 (150.181.7.224) time=4 ms 4 sar01gnvlsc-tge-0-2-0-2.gnvl.sc.charter.com (96.34.65.15) time=8 ms 5 dtr01hlrgnc-gbe-4-15.hlrg.nc.charter.com (96.34.64.172) time=11 ms 6 acr01mgtnnc-vln-492.mgtn.nc.charter.com (96.34.67.202) time=25 ms 7 bbr01gnvlsc-bue-3.gnvl.sc.charter.com (96.34.2.112) time=32 ms 8 bbr01chcgil-tge-0-1-0-6.chcg.il.charter.com (96.34.0.135) time=35 ms 9 bbr01chcgil-tge-0-3-0-8.chcg.il.charter.com (96.34.0.184) time=39 ms 10 prr01snjsca-tge-0-0-0-1.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.3.35) time=45 ms 11 96-34-150-59.static.unas.mo.charter.com (96.34.150.59) time=37 ms 12 209.85.251.13 (209.85.251.13) time=39 ms 13 209.85.241.153 (209.85.241.153) time=35 ms 14 dns.google (8.8.8.8) time=36 ms *** Traceroute at destination *** Traceroute to google.com (216.239.32.117), 64 hops max. 1 192.168.4.1 (192.168.4.1) time=2 ms 2 71-11-89-73.static.hlrg.nc.charter.com (71.11.89.73) time=2 ms 3 150.181.7.224 (150.181.7.224) time=4 ms 4 sar01gnvlsc-tge-0-2-0-2.gnvl.sc.charter.com (96.34.65.15) time=5 ms 5 dtr01hlrgnc-gbe-4-15.hlrg.nc.charter.com (96.34.64.172) time=5 ms 6 acr01mgtnnc-vln-492.mgtn.nc.charter.com (96.34.67.202) time=24 ms 7 bbr01gnvlsc-bue-3.gnvl.sc.charter.com (96.34.2.112) time=28 ms 8 bbr01chcgil-tge-0-1-0-6.chcg.il.charter.com (96.34.0.135) time=28 ms 9 bbr01chcgil-tge-0-3-0-8.chcg.il.charter.com (96.34.0.184) time=41 ms 10 prr01snjsca-tge-0-0-0-1.snjs.ca.charter.com (96.34.3.35) time=33 ms 11 74.125.51.142 (74.125.51.142) time=35 ms 12 108.170.225.164 (108.170.225.164) time=36 ms 13 108.170.225.109 (108.170.225.109) time=38 ms 14 216.239.32.117 (216.239.32.117) time=35 ms *** Traceroute at destination ***
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
