Cheaters gunna cheat cheat cheat cheat. 

I think we need to make it easier for small companies and hold criminal those 
who do cheat. 

Did Limitless have to pay the 35 mil back?  I don’t think so. And they are 
bankrupt anyway. But they continue operating a world wide network after 
stiffing the USDA. 

> On Jan 31, 2020, at 12:28 AM, Jason McKemie 
> <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> 
> It seems like there wouldn't be a good way to guarantee that the funds 
> couldn't be used for whatever they want. If they're getting "free" money to 
> build out their network, then the funds that they previously would have used 
> for that purpose can now be used for said Ferrari, etc. 
> 
> IMO there are better uses for this money and the government should stay the 
> hell out of it.
> 
>> On Thursday, January 30, 2020, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm betting CEO bonuses weren't an eligible expense for CAF, but I couldn't 
>> say for sure.
>> 
>> Even if these scenarios went exactly as described, I'm not entirely sure 
>> what the logical conclusion we're supposed to draw is.  Is it "Frontier used 
>> public funds inappropriately, therefore we should not make effort to ensure 
>> appropriate use of public funds"? Even if the first part is true, the second 
>> doesn't really follow.
>> 
>> I'm guessing from your ideas earlier that you're saying the bidder should be 
>> vetted ahead of time rather than audited after the fact.  I suspect it would 
>> actually be easier to cheat that way.
>> 
>> 
>>> On 1/30/2020 9:01 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>> Frontier - took CAF funding.
>>> CEO took huge payouts
>>> CEO buys Ferrari
>>> Frontier - Declares bankruptcy
>>> 
>>> Limitless Mobile - gets 35 million
>>> Builds multi county “rural” broadband network in the most populated areas 
>>> of the counties.
>>> Promptly declares bankruptcy
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 30, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> A clever enough cheater will always find a way to cheat, but you can't 
>>>> make it too easy.
>>>> 
>>>> For NY BPO "Connect NY" there was physical verification that each piece of 
>>>> equipment you bought actually existed somewhere.....whether in the field 
>>>> or in storage.  The auditor seemed satisfied with a list of serial numbers 
>>>> plus photographs of all the installations.  We made it very well organized 
>>>> for them: "Rectifier A, Backhaul B, and Base Station C are located at Site 
>>>> X.  Here are our installation photos from Site X."
>>>> 
>>>> You probably wanted good records of what's installed anyway, and if 
>>>> someone takes the time to fake all of that, then maybe they deserve their 
>>>> Ferrari.
>>>> 
>>>> Can you think of a project where there was blatant fraud like that?  I can 
>>>> certainly think of times when they made poor product choices, or ended up 
>>>> with unused equipment due to a design change in the middle of the project, 
>>>> or they bought 20 of the wrong thing and had to go back and buy 20 of the 
>>>> correct thing......or something was otherwise screwed up or mismanaged.  I 
>>>> actually can't think of any project where people bought personal toys 
>>>> (like a Ferrari) with public funds, or any other type of fraud along those 
>>>> lines.  If you saw something like that, I hope you reported it.  I used it 
>>>> as an example of what people would do if there was no auditing.  There is 
>>>> auditing and consequently I don't think people are doing that.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 1/30/2020 4:12 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>>> Except that there IS auditing now... and we DO end up with this exact 
>>>>> scenario happening currently.  It's not stopping it.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 1/30/20 4:08 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>>> I'd rather not stress over audits, but auditing is a necessary evil IMO. 
>>>>>>  If there were no auditing then there's someone, somewhere who would buy 
>>>>>> a Ferrari and supply a fake invoice for rectifiers instead. I'm sure 
>>>>>> everyone on this list can think of someone they've dealt with who ought 
>>>>>> to have their homework double checked.
>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to