Yeah, you're right... I think what I was thinking of is that the spectrum analyser can scan that range. I wouldn't be surprised if they were using some ROW radios, it looks like the PMP450 does come in a 3.55-3.8ghz variety.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:21 AM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > US models of the 450 definitely won't let you do that. > > On 1/24/2020 10:18 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > I checked some of their registrations, and it looks like they're mostly > PMP450 and a few Ubiquiti radios. It's been awhile since I've done anything > with Canopy 3.65ghz stuff, but it seems to me like you might be able to set > them that high... or maybe they have some non-US radios... > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 7:01 AM Dennis Burgess via AF <af@af.afmug.com> > wrote: > >> Wonder what gear they were using. ☹ That allowed them to transmit that >> high? >> >> >> >> >> >> *[image: LTI-Full_175px]* >> >> >> *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, >> MTCINE, MTCSE, HE IPv6 Sage, Cambium ePMP Certified * >> >> Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition” >> >> *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services >> >> *Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net >> >> Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com >> >> >> >> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of * Tim Hardy >> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 7:21 PM >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation >> in 3650 - 3700 MHz band >> >> >> >> According to the Notice of Violation, they were found to be operating on >> 3723 - 3732 MHz which is a clear violation of 1.903 and you’re right that >> this is how they got caught. No question that had they not interfered with >> the ground station, this wouldn’t have come up. Once the FCC finds one >> thing, they’re going to look at everything else and that’s how the >> unregistered locations ended up part of this. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:25 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >> >> There seem to be 2 issues, one is unregistered locations which seems kind >> of petty, the other is transmitting above 3.7 GHz. I’m going to assume the >> second one got them in trouble and led to finding the first one? >> >> >> >> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:43 PM >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation >> in 3650 - 3700 MHz band >> >> >> >> The 320 you could go to at least 3695 on 10mhz. Plus the oob so if it was >> low 3700. But jerkoffs like that that don't even make a cursory check for >> earth stations you never know what they've done. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 5:03 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >> Jamming C band CATV... >> >> >> >> *From:* Mathew Howard >> >> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:59 PM >> >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation >> in 3650 - 3700 MHz band >> >> >> >> It's interesting that the signal they were interfering with was in the >> 3700-4200mhz band. I wonder what they were doing... >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Isnt that the first 3ghz one? >> >> >> >> I wish that more people had been nailed, its said other "license" holders >> had no recourse, it took a fixed station to be interfered with >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 3:35 PM Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> BREVARD WIRELESS, INC. DBA FLORIDA HIGH SPEED INTERNET, LICENSEE OF >> STATION WQMJ660. Brevard Wireless, Inc. dba Florida High Speed Internet >> agrees to $16,000 settlement and compliance plan resolving investigation >> into unauthorized operation in the 3650-3700MHz band . Action by: Deputy >> Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 2020-01-22 by Order/Consent Decree. (DA >> No. 20-46). EB. DA-20-46A1.docx >> <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.docx> DA-20-46A1.pdf >> <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.pdf>DA-20-46A1.txt >> <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.txt> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
