But that didn’t cause crashes.  
And I don’t think that will ever cause crashes.  

If it passes certification testing then it “should” be safe.  
If not then we cannot trust any aircraft.  

From: Carl Peterson 
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 9:15 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT bad stock tips

The newer high efficiency engines are too big to fit under the wings.  The 
engineers told them it wouldn't work.  The original plan was to start working 
on designing a new plane, but they were afraid of losing business to neo so the 
engineers were told to make it work.  In order to do this, they pushed the 
engines up and mostly in front of the wing which pushed CG forward and moved 
center of thrust.  This lead to a plane that needs a much narrower flight 
envelope, i.e it doesn't want to fly in a lot of attitudes where a real 737 is 
fine.   


On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:48 AM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  Why do you believe it is inherently flawed?  

  It is a 737, the airframe with the best track record on the planet.

  It is too bad they did not have a voting/contention algorithm between the two 
angle of attack sensors and chose to only use one as the authoritative source.  
That was a boneheaded coding decision.  The other sensor had live data on the 
network that was there for the using.  

  It is too bad the pilots failed to absorb the training update telling them to 
switch off the system when it was causing control inputs that were obviously 
wrong.

  It is too bad the pilots did not simply switch it off.  I have had runaway 
trim motors try to do this to me before and that is something you learn during 
primary training.  

  Even then, you can recover almost all upsets with 
“push-power-rudder-roll-climb”.

  It is too bad that Boeing did not immediately tell operators to cease using 
that system after the first crash.

  But this is just one system amongst hundreds on the aircraft, all tried and 
true for many years.  


  From: Carl Peterson 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:18 AM
  To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT bad stock tips

  The Max is inherently flawed and I'd generally say don't bet on things with 
inherent flaws.  Think F35 and how long it took to get that kind of sort of 
right.  The CG is too far forward.  Perhaps if they stretched the aft section a 
little and swept the wings back a little but then it wouldn't be a 737 anymore. 
   

  I have an idea of building up a list of ISPs with rural exposure and shorting 
them because Sarlink is going to blow up a lot of their business model.    In 
particular, I'd look for double play ISPs with ARPU above about 75.  

  On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 9:39 PM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

    Boeing is going to have a good year.  The MAX 737 saga is coming to an end 
and their while system will be better because of it.  And then it will be 
forgotten.  Just like VW emissions testing...

    Even so, I am going to stick with my super high priced index fund.  It is 
at a historical high and I still dumped more money into it.  

    From: Ken Hohhof 
    Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 8:26 PM
    To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT bad stock tips

    Something like 6 months ago my financial advisor convinced me to sell my GM 
stock and buy Boeing.  I’ve suspected I did something stupid ever since.  
Getting out of GM was probably OK, but I think Boeing has plenty of room to 
drop.  I am afraid investors may dump BA as end of year approaches to clean up 
their portfolio or take tax losses, and in any case, they are not looking like 
a well run company.



    So if you want to double down on your Moviepass adventure, you could buy a 
bunch of Boeing.



    Or how about Frontier Communications?  A bargain at less than $1.  5 years 
ago they were at $100.  Bloomberg article a couple days ago says they are 
looking for a new CEO ahead of an expected bankruptcy filing.  Which was 
totally predictable when they took on a mountain of debt to buy all the areas 
that Verizon and AT&T didn’t want.  It has to be bottoming out.  No where to go 
but up, right?





    From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
    Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 9:03 PM
    To: af@af.afmug.com
    Subject: [AFMUG] OT bad stock tips



    I am thinking of following up my strategic Moviepass investment with one in 
PG&E.  It has to be bottoming out.  No where to go but up, right?


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -- 
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    -- 
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



  -- 

  Carl Peterson


  PORT NETWORKS

  401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

  Baltimore, MD 21202

  (410) 637-3707 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- 

Carl Peterson


PORT NETWORKS

401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

Baltimore, MD 21202

(410) 637-3707 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to