First you have to take ownership, then you can easily correct the ASR
coordinates. I use google earth for that as it seems as accurate as
anything with the exception of a survey.
If they already have an ASR, you kind of have to keep it for the 200'. The
350' you have no choice. If you are buying that one and it needs paint or
the lights go out you want to take the opportunity to have it changed to
reflect the LED lights you put on and it is cheaper to buy dual strobe
red/white than paint a tower.

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 3:51 PM Roland Houin <rho...@fourway.net> wrote:

> This site has 2 towers, aprox 50’ apart
>
> 1, 200’ built aprox 1005
>
> 1, 350’ built in 1980’s
>
> The gps coordinates don’t match the asr (the 350’ is off by 470’), the
> 200’ is off by 3300’
>
> Thanks for the advice.
>
>
>
>
>
> Roland
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman
> *Sent:* Monday, October 28, 2019 4:44 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Tower lawyer
>
>
>
> Well, First, an ASR isn't required on anything 200 foot or under. So is it
> over 200 foot? If yes and you don't plan on renting space out to someone
> else you technically don't need an ASR. You can get an ASR for almost any
> structure regardless of height. ASR's make some things easier, like getting
> licensed PTP links and letting people find the tower that might want to
> rent it for instance. If it is over 200 foot or already has an ASR,
>
>
>
> I won't bore you with the story but the fact it has no NEPA will likely
> only matter to a carrier. You can actually get an ASR and self certify that
> a NEPA isn't required in about 15 minutes if you have all the info in front
> of you and know what you are doing. The only reason you need a NEPA anyway
> is that the Feds say you need one to get an ASR, which is a Fed thing. No
> ASR needed, no NEPA required. NEPA can be frustrating. I spent months doing
> the work, hiring experts, etc, etc. all to come to the conclusion that no
> NEPA was required. It seems cyclical but the bottom line is you can do all
> the studies and if they come back clean the only place it is recorded is in
> the E-106 study, not the ASR.I'll show you an example of what I mean. The
> tower below had a full NEPA/NHPA
>
> ASR 1302897
> <https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/asrRegistration.jsp?regKey=2702592>
>
> Here is the Enviro section. As you can see, it says " Environmental
> Notification is complete and an Environmental Assessment is not required. "
> You don't know it isn't required until you do it, but the effect of doing
> is the same as if you just clicked the box that it isn't required, one
> isn't needed. You can't submit an assessment if one isn't required, at
> least not the last time I did one. Kind of Catch 22 but if you tell the FCC
> that they can't even underatand why you would say that.
>
> *Environmental Compliance*
>
> Does the applicant request a Waiver of the Commission's rules for
> environmental notice?
>
> Is the applicant submitting an Environmental Assessment?
>
> No
>
> No
>
> Is another Federal Agency taking responsibility for environmental review?
>
> Does the applicant certify to No Significant Environmental Effect pursuant
> to Section
>
> No
>
> Yes
>
> Reason for another Federal Agency taking responsibility for environmental
> review
>
> Basis for Certification
>
>
>
> Environmental Notification is complete and an Environmental Assessment is
> not required.
>
> Name of Federal Agency
>
> Local Notice Date
>
>
>
> 05/25/2017
>
> National Notice Date
>
> 05/30/2017
>
>
>
> Anyway, up to you for what its worth. The bottom line, you are not
> required to do anything if you don't want an ASR. If you do, you have to
> start playing the Feds games.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:30 PM Roland Houin <rho...@fourway.net> wrote:
>
> My concern is that there are rumors that this site may not have been
> compliant with fcc requirements.
>
> Tower installed after 2000, no nepa?
>
> Want to make sure that there aren’t any suprises…
>
> Thanks for the advice..
>
>
>
> Roland
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
> *Sent:* Monday, October 28, 2019 3:13 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Tower lawyer
>
>
>
> Funny, when I saw the original post my first thought was: “do whatever
> Lewis says to do”
>
>
>
> *From:* Lewis Bergman
>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 28, 2019 6:11 PM
>
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Tower lawyer
>
>
>
> In my experience, lawyers are really good at screwing up deals. But, if
> you are buying an asset, there aren't a lot of legal issues that follow
> assets other than sales taxes. I'm not saying you don't need a lawyer, just
> that a lot of lawyers gum up the negotiations so bad you can't get a deal
> done. To save money and time you should a very well defined idea of what
> the lawyer is going to do for you and communicate that. They aren't experts
> in everything and they charge you for the time it takes them to learn
> stuff.
>
>
>
> The last tower I bought from Crown Castle all I got was a bill of sale. No
> contract, no nothing.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:08 AM Roland Houin <rho...@fourway.net> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have recommendation for a lawyer etc to handle tower issued.
>
> I’m thinking of purchasing a tower, & want to make sure it’s compliant
> with todays legal issues.
>
>
>
> Roland
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Lewis Bergman
>
> 325-439-0533 Cell
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Lewis Bergman
>
> 325-439-0533 Cell
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>


-- 
Lewis Bergman
325-439-0533 Cell
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to