I guess 6 is moot. I thought GAA operated under SAS as well. Is that verified?
I guess the better question, having that knowledge, is what recourse is there in GAA? under the N license when we did the webinar with FCC, FCCs response was to contact rick harnish if there was a conflict that couldnt be resolved. in other words, thanks for your 200 bucks. If this is the case, the LTE is pretty much a terrible idea long term anywhere there is more than one provider since it doesnt handle noise well. Do you know if there is a map of where the test deployments are in general? Im assuming NDA type stuff says no. One thing that came up today was the potential of cellco usage in 48, is there going to be prohibited use of consumer grade systems in this band like the Wilson amplifiers? On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:55 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: > Answers (at least the ones I have) are inline. > > On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:30 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I dont know if anybody here is involved in the trial, or knows anyone who > is, or if anybody who is is allowed to answer any of these questions. I get > alot of answers from people not in the trials, its all guesswork though, Id > like to her something definitive. The answers are driving a 100k difference > in product decisions. If any of you degenerates are involved or can > forward to people who are involved, Id give my first born for clear answers > > > 1. Are you overlapped with other CBRS/SAS trial operators? > > > No > > > 1. Is the overlap same county/neighboring county? > > > Not in a test environment > > > 1. What are the SAS controls looking like. EIRP alterations, channel > changes, channel size decreases, etc? > > > The experimental versions of all the SAS’s as far as I am aware were not > actually doing anything other than checking for incumbents. I don’t think > any of them were doing actual RF propagation modeling. > > > 1. How often are SAS commands being issued? (constantly, hourly, > daily, weekly, rarely, etc?) > > > The database between the SAS’es only updates once per day. You likely > won’t see updates other than overnight (at least initially). > > > 1. Is there any site/POP colocation with other CBRS/SAS trial > operators? > > > Not for us > > > 1. Are you able to effectively operate ABAB/ABCD within the band > effectively while overlapping, and in what channel size? > > > We currently do in Part 90z. There is no reason you can’t in CBRS. > > > > 1. Have you come across a scenario where your operations were ceased > by SAS? > > > Not so far. > > > > i. Example > being, all CBRS channels in use and a temporary outage occurs, during which > time another operator is granted access to the silent channel. > > > > 1. Does SAS impact your operation among your own cells. > > > It’s not supposed to - this is something Winnforum and the SAS’s are > working on. > > > 1. Are you able to allow overlap in your own cells that would not be > an option with another operator present on the license region? > > > should be > > > 1. Is the predeployment modelling available from any of the SAS > vendors for site planning? > > > There are hooks in the SAS where you can request frequencies, but you > can’t necessarily query what is in use. It’s a stupid security thing the > telcos insisted on. So you can ask “can I have 3550 in 10Mhz” and it will > tell you it’s not in use. And then you can ask about 3560 and it will > tell you. But it won’t answer “What is available”. > > > 1. Are there real time tools for monitoring your regional CBRS > environment? > 2. How have you dealt with non CBRS/SAS trial operators still > operating under the N license? > > > Just our own stuff > > > 1. Has the mechanism for recourse been defined should SAS not resolve > conflicting CBRS operations amongst operators. > > > That question needs clarification. SAS is not supposed to deconflict > GAA, it’s the wild west. > > > 1. Is there a tool for obtaining a contact when there is a discrepancy > to self resolve amongst operators? > > > yes > > > 1. When operating near a county line, assuming it is PAL operation, > are you able to place a subscriber onto that base station that resides in > the neighboring county? > > > Nothing prevents it as long as that subscriber doesn’t create excessive > interference for the PAL operator. > > > 1. If operating in GAA in this environment, does the neighboring > county GAA supersede the ability to install a subscriber to the > neighboring > county base station? If so, how does SAS calculate the Instruction set > to > the base station? > > > The SAS protects PAL’s, not GAA. > > > > > I don’t know if anyone is able to provide any of these answers due to NDA > or not > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
