+1. We used them when we had almost a hundred links. I think it only cost about $1000 a year for them to monitor all of them. I used to spend hours every week combing through all the Verizon, Sprint, AT&T and everyone elses filings. After that I never had to look at it again. On one occasion I remember, Commsearch contacted me with details about an applicaiton that had been filed along our path that would likely cause interference. I asked them to fight that and the application was modified to eliminate the chance. Well worth the money.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 8:33 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > commsearch protection service is relatively inexpensive. We got with them > because they happened to reach out to us on one that we would not have been > aware of. Worth the nominal fee. Then things like this arent a question for > you to think about > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:22 PM <mhopk...@onlinenw.com> wrote: > >> Thank you Tim, I'll send it over to you. They are adjacent channels, I >> think maybe Micronet meant that because there was at least 2.8 MHz >> between the two that it should be OK. The emission designator 74M4D7D >> implies the AF-11FX actually occupies 74.4 MHz. I just get nervous >> sometimes about adjacent channels. >> I use Comsearch for our coordinations, hopefully it was a good 40 years >> for you. >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 2:04 PM Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Matt, >> >> Send me the PCN and I'll take a look at it and let you know. 2.8 MHz >> separation doesn't sound right at 11 GHz since there is no frequency plans >> that would give you that kind of separation. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tim Hardy >> >> FYI, I was one of the three founders of Comsearch back in 1977 and retired >> in 2017 after 40 years - enjoying life at the beach, so you can see, I >> have >> no dog in this fight. >> >> > On Jun 19, 2019, at 4:43 PM, mhopk...@onlinenw.com wrote: >> > Hello, >> > We have a SAF 80MHz 11GHz link between a couple of towers. There is a >> > new PCN for a new 80MHz UBNT AF-11FX link that is at the same tower site >> as one of our ends. Their path would shoot past our tower at that site. >> There is 2.8MHz of separation between our channels and the polarity is >> the same (H). We have many licensed links but we are pretty rural and >> have not had any other PCNs this close to our >> > channels. Would you be comfortable with allowing this link? We reached >> out to the coordinator for the new link and they said it is within the >> acceptable range. Thank you in advance for any insight you can >> > provide. >> > Matt Hopkins >> > Network Administrator >> > 503.687.1030 >> > mhopk...@onlinenw.net >> > onlinenw.com >> >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- Lewis Bergman 325-439-0533 Cell
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
