The repairs were to prevent the spire from collapsing..
On 04/17/2019 09:12 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
It was undergoing restoration/repair work at the time (which may be
implicated as the source of the fire). Perhaps they were doing some fire
prevention work too?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 4/17/2019 8:59 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Smart ass....
Perhaps some bureaucracy would not allow the modification. I have a
kid that lives in England. They have structures that cannot be
repaired, even in the most minor way, without detailed plans,
approvals and using only a select set of approved handymen.
*From:* Bill Prince
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:55 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Notre Dame
Maybe because it was built 800 years ago?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 4/17/2019 8:50 AM, [email protected] wrote:
According to the series of tubes I consulted:
*“Notre*-*Dame did*not*have*automatic*sprinklers*in the framework of
the roof, and its attic space*was*not compartmentalized with
fire-breaking walls, said Frédéric Létoffé, a construction expert.“
Too bad and I wonder why.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
