*forums and * fail for the previous post On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 9:46 PM Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Josh, > > UBNT is saying in the forms that the problem with ethernet jacks has been > taken care of. > https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber-LTU/AF5XHD-ethernet-port-vs-AF5X-ethernet-port/td-p/2562992 > > I know its still loose on the HD but have you had any links fair in > production on the HD because of those problem? > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Yeah, I can't see any difference in the ethernet ports, so I assumed >> they'll still have the same problems. I haven't actually seen any problems >> with the ethernet on an AF5XHD yet... but it doesn't always happen on the >> old radios either, so that doesn't prove much. They also have the advantage >> that of a usable second ethernet port, so you can hook up both and hope at >> least one keeps working. >> >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:50 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I didn't have any problem installing the boots or plugging or unplugging >>> a cable with the boot installed. >>> The AF5XHD is good for the money. I can't complain. The only thing I'd >>> be ware of is you really want a super hot CINR to hit the high data rates >>> that they advertise. >>> >>> We just used an AF5XHD with 34dbi dishes to replace an ePMP with their >>> 25dbi dishes. On the exact same channel the ePMP was on, the AF5XHD didn't >>> actually give us better throughput. We did end up getting more than double >>> the speed after shuffling channels around to reduce interference. It's >>> unfortunately still only getting 64QAM (4x) in one direction due to >>> interference, but it's 1024QAM (10x) in the other direction. >>> >>> On 11/16/2018 3:04 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>> >>> Who said that? It's the exact same problem, it's so damn loose. Yes, >>> you still have to force that cable up there for it to work. >>> >>> They did include a rubber IP67 boot. If you put this inside and try to >>> put a cat5/rj45 in there you'll destroy the female jack of the radio. I >>> would guess if you slid the rubber thing over the cat5, plugged it in, and >>> kept that boot in there it would help it from coming down at all but the >>> trade there is a new tech will destroy the radio more often than what the >>> boot would help... >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < >>> lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Josh, >>>> >>>> I thought they fixed the Ethernet jack on the AF5XHD? That is what UBNT >>>> is telling me they said they found a problem vendor. Are you still having >>>> issues where you have to push the RJ45 up into the AF to get the ethernet >>>> link to come back? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:15 PM Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> AF5Xhd is pretty sweet. I'm happier radio wise than the AF5X. It's >>>>> still a shit ethernet jack. >>>>> >>>>> As to ptmp, the snmp seems to be built with that in mind. As to when >>>>> it'll come, all I can say is I've heard questions with no answer. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We have been using the AF5XHD as well. I'm happy with it as a PTP >>>>>> platform, but in a lot of our areas we are running 2 foot dishes for even >>>>>> the shorter hops to achieve the SNR for 1024QAM. It's kicking ass though, >>>>>> and these links probably should have been bigger dishes to begin with so >>>>>> it >>>>>> is what it is. >>>>>> >>>>>> Highlights are mostly that now 256Q(8x) has a effective output power >>>>>> of 21db-22db, compared to the 18db on a good day of the original 5X. I >>>>>> think 1024Q (10x) is now more like 18db-19db now which is a huge >>>>>> improvement compared to the original 5X. It has helped quite a few of the >>>>>> links we have replaced. >>>>>> >>>>>> Joe >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:19 PM Timothy Steele < >>>>>> timothy.pct...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> AirFiberxHD (PTP LTU) has been working awesome at least 2 times the >>>>>>> throughput and uses a lot less power then AirfiberX >>>>>>> >>>>>>> grate for solar sites >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:42 PM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Who cares, Ubiquiti likes to sue their customers so why would >>>>>>>> anyone wanna buy their crap?!?! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Sean >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:31 AM Paul McCall <pa...@pdmnet.net> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Has anyone heard any update on when the PTMP Airfiber or other >>>>>>>>> UBNT LTU gear is coming? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It seems like the fodder / vaporware cycle on this has been >>>>>>>>> running long then normal >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Paul >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
