Hi Orly, Thank you for the example, I see what you mean now. It turns out that in the case of 206 this is a trademarked term in some countries, but since my campaign was targeting the US I couldn't generate the error. It will never be possible to completely avoid these types of policy errors, but using the validateOnly header and exemptionRequests you should be able to work around them.
Best, - Eric On Apr 30, 9:31 am, Orly Junior <orly.jun...@periscopix.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, many thanks for your reply. > > An instance of the problem could be reproduced by the following > request id: "867c6a6b4d06f8fbbf39f2972ed738db" > > Your suggestion of using the validateOnly was very helpful. We > overlooked it as a possiblity and it will come in handy on identifying > the rejected ads before we have the batch submitted. > > Thanks again and best regards, > > Orly > > -- > =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ > Also find us on our blog and discussion > group:http://adwordsapi.blogspot.comhttp://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api > =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. > To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
