Thank you Del for clarification. Now its getting strange after: "With Spectrum Protect server version 6.3, IBM does not recommend on line index reorganization on BF_AGGREGATED_BITFILES,BF_BITFILE_EXTENTS,BACKUP_OBJECTS,ARCHIVE_OBJECTS" as I did it with success (and significant reduce of db and increase of overall performance) on several such servers. Could you elaborate more on why is such recommendation now? Previously I thought that those tables are disabled by default to make people aware of enabling them. Kind regards Krzysztof
2016-04-25 17:09 GMT+02:00 Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com>: > In > http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21683633#online_index > IBM was trying to discuss the improvements that have been made to the on > line index reorganization initiated by the Spectrum Protect server. It was > not IBM's intention to recommend that the above DB2 commands be executed > outside of the Spectrum Protect server. Except for some exceptional case > on line reorganization should only be initiated by the Spectrum Protect > server. > > For Spectrum Protect server version 6.3, IBM recommends upgrading to at > least version 6.3.5.000 which will allow the use of this server option > DISABLEREORGINDEX > the default value for DISABLEREORGINDEX is > BF_AGGREGATED_BITFILES,BF_BITFILE_EXTENTS,BACKUP_OBJECTS,ARCHIVE_OBJECTS > > With Spectrum Protect server version 6.3, IBM does not recommend on line > index reorganization on > BF_AGGREGATED_BITFILES,BF_BITFILE_EXTENTS,BACKUP_OBJECTS,ARCHIVE_OBJECTS > > > IBM will clarify the information and update the technote. > > > > Thank you, > > Del > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 04/25/2016 > 06:34:58 AM: > > > From: Krzysztof Przygoda <przy...@gmail.com> > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > Date: 04/25/2016 06:35 AM > > Subject: Re: Manual db2 online reorg for ver.6.3 > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > > > Anyone from IBM? > > Recently we raised PMR with such but support seems just to quote the > same > > docs... > > Kind regards > > Krzysztof > > > > > > 2016-04-22 10:11 GMT+02:00 Krzysztof Przygoda <przy...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi > > > Just wondering if anyone tried with TSM ver 6.3 method described in > > > document related to ver 7.1 > > > http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21683633 > > > > > > "*Online index reorganization* > > > > > > You can initiate online index reorganization by running a command with > the > > > following syntax: > > > db2 reorg indexes all for table <table name> allow write access > > > > > > For example: > > > db2 reorg indexes all for table BF_AGGREGATED_BITFILES allow write > access > > > > > > " > > > > > > as that part is missing in previous document version: > > > http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21452146 > > > > > > Seems to be pure db2 thing and would be nice to be able to use > such...when > > > we don't want to start it as automatic. > > > Question is if TSM doing something more when initiating that for its > own > > > or if such manual run on db2 is anyhow harmful to tsm? > > > > > > > > > Kind regards > > > Krzysztof > > > > > >
