Hello, Anyway, the last access timestamp is generally mandatory if you're using HSM.
Le 8 octobre 2015 13:55:36 CEST, Bent Christensen <b...@cowi.dk> a écrit : >Your offhand thought is correct. > >NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate goes all the way back to Windows 2000 where >the time stamp of a directory would change if you did something with >the files in it. > >I find it hard to imagine that anyone backs up based on the last-access >time stamp and not the last-written time stamp? > > - Bent > > >-----Original Message----- > >All, > >TSM 7.1.1 environment. >My Windows fileserver colleague is asking me about any potential backup >ramifications from disabling the LastAccessUpdate on our new Windows >2012R2 fileservers. >I didn't find any definitive answers via Mr. Google so I thought I'd >reach out and see if anyone in the group had some knowledge. >My offhand thought is that since we don't do any HSM, we don't really >use this particular bit, but... > >Here is what he asked: > >By default Windows Server 2012 R2 disabled Last Access Update on files >and folders. >This is the registry location where this is stored: >HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem\NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate >This KB articles discusses this and it says this: >https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc785435.aspx >The disablelastaccess parameter can affect programs such as Backup and >Remote Storage that rely on this feature. >Does the TSM Baclient rely on this value? With it disabled do we lose >anything with TSM? > >Thanks, >Steve Schaub >Systems Engineer II, Backup/Recovery >Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee >E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm -- Erwann SIMON Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
