Hi,
nice query, thanks for the hints, both Rick and Chavdar. Seem to me that there
is some bug in the code, based on the thresholds and the technote, with 0 pools
associated, the devclass should always be ’green’, but, for one server:
Server Name: TSMOGACM00
Activity Date: 28-05-2015 08:50:06
Activity Name: NON-SHARED FILE DEV PERCENTAGE SCRATCH VOLUMES
UNALLOCATABLE
Element Name: DC_DBB
Element Numeric Value: 45
Element String Value:
Element State: WARNING
so, this means that the filesystem is only able to host 55% of the potential
scratch volumes that could land on the file system, except that there are 0
pools, and thus 0 potential scratch volumes… My guess is that somebody thought
infinite is somehow not the right answer and fixed a dev/0 error in the wrong
way.
Or, if the technote incomplete and is there some other calculation also
involved?
> Op 27 mei 2015, om 20:26 heeft Rick Adamson <rickadam...@segrocers.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> If I remember correctly it has been historically listed as a known issue
> since v6.x.
>
> But in version 7.1 this was released on the warning status.....
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21696240
>
> -Rick Adamson
> Jacksonville, FL.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Remco Post
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 11:01 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] OC device class state
>
> Hi All,
>
> I’ve just recently upgraded my TSM configuration manager server to 7.1.1.100
> and installed and configured OC. One thing I noticed that out of the two TSM
> servers now at 7.1.1.100 and monitored by OC, two report an issue with a file
> device class that is only used for database backups. One server reports that
> device class with a status of ’warning’ and the other with a status of
> ’critical’. I can’t figure out why the OC reports these device classes as not
> healthy. There are no events, and there is no indication of why OC thinks
> there is something wrong. At least, not that I can find. Anyone got any hints
> as to what could be ’wrong’?
>
> --
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,
>
> Remco Post
> r.p...@plcs.nl
> +31 6 248 21 622
--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,
Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622
