Hello, I agree to 100%! The text file was the best thing. The new HTML version is unusable.
Bye Rainer On 09.07.2014 15:24, Rick Adamson wrote: > I had the same issue with patches Kurt. > > The folders on the FTP site used to have a text document that conveniently > provided links to the apars addressed in a particular patch, but now they are > no longer there. > > Recently I went to see if a patch or maintenance level was available to > address a specific issue and then spent an hour trying to find the associated > documented apars it addressed. > > IBM again raised the bar for complicating life as we know it.....thank > goodness for Google > > Rick Adamson > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > BEYERS Kurt > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 5:54 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [ADSM-L] APARs fixed in TSM 7.1.0.100 > > Hello everybody, > > I'm in the process of upgrading our TSM servers from TSM 6.3.4 to TSM 7.1 > because the latter version is a prerequisite for the Oracle T10000D tape > drives we will start using. I would have preferred to wait for TSM 7.1.1, > but that does not fit the into the planning. > > I've seen that a patch level 7.1.0.100 is available for download. I've tried > to find the APAR's that are solved in it, especially for TSM Server, but the > only thing I've found so far is for the OC: > > <copy> > APARs fixed in level 7.1.0.100 > This interim fix does not include APAR fixes. It updates Operations Center > V7.1.0 so that you can run the Operations Center on Linux on an IBM Power > Systems server. > </copy> > > I've also checked the README.html included in the bin file, but their they > refer only to links towards the Information Center / Knowledge Center. > > So does anybody knows the URL where you can find the APAR's fixed for TSM > 7.1.0.100. If it is restricted towards running the OC in a new environment, > I'll skip the upgrade. Although the quest to find the fixed APAR's is taking > longer then the actual install itself would consume. > > IBM is getting worse than Oracle, their MOS website is also a jungle where > you get lost easily. :( > > Thanks for any answers in advance! > > Best regards, > Kurt > > > *** Disclaimer *** > Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie Auguste Reyerslaan 52, 1043 > Brussel > > nv van publiek recht > BTW BE 0244.142.664 > RPR Brussel > http://www.vrt.be/gebruiksvoorwaarden > >