I suspect this: http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC81110
Best regards, Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Hartford/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu> wrote on 2012-11-16 04:51:00: > From: Paul van Dongen <paul.vandon...@vancis.nl> > To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, > Date: 2012-11-16 04:53 > Subject: FW: query occ vs select from occupancy > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu> > > Hi, > > Before someone tells me that used two different nodes, this was the > result of a wrong replace action. I can assure that both commands > were directed to the same node name > > Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, > > > Paul van Dongen > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On > Behalf Of Paul van Dongen > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 10:18 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [ADSM-L] query occ vs select from occupancy > > Hi TSM people, > > I saw some uncommon output from a Q OCC command for a large node > this morning and I would like to ask if any of you saw this before: > > Server is 5.5.5.2 on AIX. > > Query occupancy gives me: > > tsm:XXXX>q occ X0000_FSX > > Node Name Type Filespace FSID Storage > Number of Physical Logical > Name Pool Name > Files Space Space > > Occupied Occupied > > (MB) (MB) > ---------- ---- ---------- ----- ---------- > --------- --------- --------- > X0000_FS8 Bkup /homepool 1 FS-COPY 21, > 843,78 3,968,123 3,888,302 > > 8 .35 .25 > X0000_FS8 Bkup /homepool 1 FS-DISK > 7,181 483,413.1 483,413.1 > > 2 2 > X0000_FS8 Bkup /homepool 1 FS-TAPE 21, > 849,19 4,234,593 4,046,654 > > 8 .39 .60 > X0000_FS8 Bkup / 2 FS-COPY > 186,630 18,717.17 16,554.75 > X0000_FS8 Bkup / 2 FS-TAPE > 186,732 21,191.67 16,697.96 > X0000_FS8 Bkup /boot 3 FS-COPY > 234 50.10 49.97 > X0000_FS8 Bkup /boot 3 FS-TAPE > 234 78.27 49.97 > > So I conclude that my /homepool filesystem uses about 4TB logical > storage in TSM > > And a SELECT gives something else: > > tsm: XXXX>select > NODE_NAME,FILESPACE_NAME,STGPOOL_NAME,NUM_FILES,LOGICAL_MB from > occupancy where node_name='X0000_FSX' > > NODE_NAME FILESPACE_NAME STGPOOL_NAME > NUM_FILES LOGICAL_MB > ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ > ----------- ---------------- > X0000_FSX /homepool FS-COPY > 21843788 46837975.20 > X0000_FSX /homepool FS-DISK > 7181 483413.11 > X0000_FSX /homepool FS-TAPE > 21849198 46996327.55 > X0000_FSX / FS-COPY > 186630 16554.74 > X0000_FSX / FS-TAPE > 186732 16697.95 > X0000_FSX /boot FS-COPY > 234 49.96 > X0000_FSX /boot FS-TAPE > 234 49.96 > > And now I get 40+TB instead of 4? > > Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, > > > Paul van Dongen > >
