We entered them into the library using the LABEL command with the CHECKIN option, so they should be labeled correctly.
Sam Sheppard San Diego Data Processing Corp. (858)-581-9668 -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Rhodes Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 12:01 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3592JB tapes Did they by chance come pre-labeled? This happened to us once - pre-labeled tapes came labeled wrong and we had to relabel them. Rick Fred Johanson <f...@uchicago.ed U> To Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager" <ads...@vm.marist Subject .EDU> Re: 3592JB tapes 06/08/2010 02:53 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ads...@vm.marist .EDU> As I understood the explanation when we had a similar problem, those volumes labeled on the E05 would write at that density. If I understood correctly, what you see looks normal. ________________________________________ From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Sheppard, Sam [sshepp...@sddpc.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 1:36 PM To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3592JB tapes These were labeled in the only drive type we have, TS1120 (3592-E05). Sam Sheppard San Diego Data Processing Corp. (858)-581-9668 -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Fred Johanson Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 11:27 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3592JB tapes Which drive wrote the initial label? ________________________________________ From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Sheppard, Sam [sshepp...@sddpc.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 1:20 PM To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Subject: [ADSM-L] 3592JB tapes We have just purchased a bunch of 3592JB tapes (700GB uncompressed capacity) to use for some large NDMP backups. My first test last night backing up around 1.8TB of data completely filled two of these tapes. This is only marginally better than what I was getting on the 3592JA tapes which are rated at 300GB uncompressed. We have 8 TS1120 (3592-E05) drives in a 3494 library and are running TSM 6.1.3.4. The device class specifies FORMAT=DRIVE which should cause recording at the highest available density. I would think almost all of this data would fit on one of these volumes. Any ideas where I am going wrong? Thanks Sam Sheppard San Diego Data Processing Corp. (858)-581-9668 ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
