Allen S. Rout wrote: >>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:20:48 +0200, Remco Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> Been there done that, you are right. Now, explain, why do we need a >> backup volhist command then? > > Like the appendix on our large intestine. Vestigial? > > Someone suggested "Well, now we write those every time something > changes, let's remove the BACKUP VOLHIST command", and someone else at > IBM had a spasm, thinking of all the admins with BACK VOLHIST in their > schedules all failing, all calling support... >
failing or just reporting 'obsolete' in the actlog? Anyway, It does have it's use with the file= option. > - Allen S. Rout -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post, PLCS
