Ian, Both options are best practices. According to IBM one should use the CAD to control the scheduler (on Netware I would advise it as well).
Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards, Richard van Denzel -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Smith, I (Ian) Verzonden: vrijdag 13 oktober 2006 12:59 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] CAD Control Client scheduler Hello Do people use the CAD to control the scheduler? Is this a good idea, what happens if the CAD fails? Is this best practice? _____________________________ Ian Smith SAN/TSM Specialist _____________________________________________________________ This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat. _____________________________________________________________
