Can the upper management get any more vague with their request? Throughput of what, data being backed up...data being restored...what? Personally, my concerns lay in Disaster Recovery, because that's where the rubber meets the road. It also depends upon the size of your files and whether your data is collocated, are you running older SCSI drives or newer fiber drives? It all makes a difference.
Sincerely, Bruce A. Tamulis, CNA LDS Support Tech III 616-752-6573 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Start using HEAT Self Serve (HSS) Today! Just click on the link below. http://hss.trinity-health.org/ This message may contain confidential information protected by law through attorney-client privilege or professional peer review/quality evaluation privilege. It is intended only for the individual or entity named above. It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the contents of this message. If you received this message in error, please notify me immediately at the above number. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, May 16, 2006 >>> My upper management has asked that I compare the performance of a Linux-based TSM server to a Windows-based one in terms of throughput. We currently use Windows TSM servers. Before I start doing any in depth testing and research, has anyone else done this type of comparison and if so, what were your findings? Mel Dennis Systems Engineer - IT743 Siemens Power Generation 4400 Alafaya Trail Orlando, FL 32826 MC Q1-108 Tel: (407) 736-2360 Win: 439-2360 Fax: (407) 243-0260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
