Hi Del! Your statement "Customer always have the option of not installing a fix release, and waiting for the next PTF or release of that Data Protection client" may be true in most cases, but not when new platform support is added. You don't have the option to wait for a new release because you cannot backup your production data in the meantime! We normally use the most recent maintenance levels for all TSM and DP clients. Only when customers encounter a bug which is fixed in a fix release, they will upgrade to that fix release, until the next maintenance release (containing the APAR) is there. The customer will replace their fix level with this new maintenance level a.s.a.p. I think most TSM customers work this way. Why didn't Tivoli add the Windows 2005 support and release this as maintenance release 5.3.0? That was a nice chance of synchronizing the level with other DP clients like DP for Exchange, DP for Lotus Domino and DP for mySAP... Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Del Hoobler Sent: maandag 7 augustus 2006 17:37 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: SQL Server 2005 support? Hi Eric, Data Protection clients do not have a "new release" (or even a PTF) near as often as the BA client does. But, there are still situations like this where we try to get customers the support they need, as soon as we can. Sometimes that means, putting this kind of support into a fix release. Customer always have the option of not installing a fix release, and waiting for the next PTF or release of that Data Protection client. Also note that Microsoft made it quite easy for vendors to add SQL Server 2005 support because they made almost everything backward compatible. There were only very minor changes that had to be made. Thanks, Del ---------------------------------------------------- "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 08/07/2006 10:00:00 AM: > Hi Del! > Thank you very much for your quick reply! > I wasn't expecting new support in a fix release... Wouldn't it be more > logical to create a 5.2.2.0 version containing 2005 support? Now we > have to backup production nodes by using a fix release, which I > normally would not recommend... > Kindest regards, > Eric van Loon > KLM Royal Dutch Airlines > ********************************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **********************************************************************
