I decided on a VTL because I wanted to have LAN-free backup ability and compression with no load on the TSM clients or TSM server. We have been using Sepaton's ES2100 VTL for over a year with no problems (HP rebrands Sepaton's product).
There have been numerous threads in this list about VTL implementations: "File dev. type vs. VTL", "VTL experiences?", " Sizing for a virtual tape library", "VTS or san disk storage", "Questions for people using Virtual tape libraries" The big advantage VTLs, and DEVCLASS=FILE volume virtualizers, have over physical tape libraries are sub-second tape mounts, rewinds and dismounts. Combined with fast seek times those characteristics have eliminated my need for collocation. I have been very satisfied with the VTL choice. H. Milton Johnson -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dearman, Richard Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:42 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: VTL experiences? Anyone out there have any good or bad experiences with VTL solutions. I was thinking about budgeting for 1 or 2 in order to phase out the current san file system I am using for TSM disk storage. There are several vendors out there with VTL solutions most notably IBM and EMC. My first choice would be to choose IBM but it is a new product and EMC has been in the market longer. Any comment or recommendation appreciated. Thanks **************************EMAIL DISCLAIMER*************************** This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender or contact Health Information Management 312.413.4947.
