Here is an excerpt from the dsmerror.log for last night, it appears we have some kind of comms issue..
I havent been able to find errno 232 or 131 in /usr/include/errno.h, nor anything on IBM's site. We can match the ANS1005E messages to ANR0480 messages on the TSM server, indicating the client ended the session... 05/24/05 05:12:44 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 05/24/05 05:12:47 ANS1005E TCP/IP read error on socket = 9, errno = 232, reason : 'Connection reset by peer'. 05/24/05 05:12:47 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 05/24/05 05:12:48 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 05/24/05 05:12:50 ANS1005E TCP/IP read error on socket = 9, errno = 232, reason : 'Connection reset by peer'. 05/24/05 05:12:50 cuConfirm: Received rc: -72 trying to receive ConfirmResp verb 05/24/05 05:12:50 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 05/24/05 05:12:51 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 05/24/05 05:13:01 ANS1810E TSM session has been reestablished. 05/24/05 05:13:03 ANS1810E TSM session has been reestablished. 05/24/05 05:13:05 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:13:05 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 05/24/05 05:13:05 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:13:05 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:13:05 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 05/24/05 05:13:05 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 05/24/05 05:13:06 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:13:06 sessOpen: Failure in communications open call. rc: -1 05/24/05 05:13:06 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 05/24/05 05:13:39 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:13:39 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 05/24/05 05:13:39 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:13:39 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 05/24/05 05:14:05 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 05/24/05 05:14:05 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 05/24/05 05:14:05 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 05/24/05 05:14:06 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure. 05/24/05 05:14:07 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:14:07 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 05/24/05 05:14:07 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:14:07 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 05/24/05 05:14:08 unknown thread, fatal error, signal 6 05/24/05 05:14:08 unknown thread, fatal error, signal 6 05/24/05 05:15:11 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:15:11 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 05/24/05 05:15:11 ANS1028S Internal program error. Please see your service representative. 05/24/05 05:15:11 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:15:11 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server 05/24/05 05:15:11 ANS1028S Internal program error. Please see your service representative. 05/24/05 05:15:12 cuIdentifyResp: Error 131 reading IdentifyResp from server. 05/24/05 05:15:12 sessOpen: Error 131 receiving IdentifyResp verb from server Computer says 'No'.. -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E Ehresman Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 8:21 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Poor LanFree performance / mixed LAN xfer?? Any clues in the dsmerror.log? >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/20/05 11:41 AM >>> Hello *SM'ers, Has anyone observed the following; We are experienceing performance problems with LanFree backups. The issue goes away with a retsart of the storage agent, but at some point in the future comes back, requiring another restart of the stoarge agent etc.. Now, when the backups are going OK, the following steps are observed, take note of what happens to the ByteCount (IE: the small cumulative indicator in the square brackets at the command line, '[12.3 G]') ; Backup started First directory entry sent Backup pauses, while byte count increments Backup generates 'unsuccesful' line, and then 'waiting for mount of offline media' ByteCount PAUSES When tape is mounted and wound, BYTECOUNT increases Very Fast. (+100 - 200MB / 'tick' ) Then end stats show simlar to; Total number of objects inspected: 3 Total number of objects backed up: 3 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 4.70 GB LanFree data bytes: 4.70 GB Data transfer time: 153.13 sec Network data transfer rate: 32,229.74 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate: 28,567.48 KB/sec Objects compressed by: 0% Elapsed processing time: 00:02:52 ..NOTE, ALL data has gone LanFree Now, when the backups are performing slowly, the following occurrs; Backup started First directory entry sent Backup pauses, while byte count increments Backup generates 'unsuccesful' line, and then 'waiting for mount of offline media' ByteCount CONTINUES TO INCREMENT SLOWLY (+15-20 MB / 'tick') When tape is mounted and wound, BYTECOUNT INCREMENTS SLOWLY (+15 - 20MB / 'tick') At the end of backup, we see this; Total number of objects inspected: 6 Total number of objects backed up: 2 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 4.18 GB LanFree data bytes: 2.37 GB Data transfer time: 42.01 sec Network data transfer rate: 104,402.77 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate: 15,331.31 KB/sec Objects compressed by: 0% Elapsed processing time: 00:04:46 Does this indicate, that in this instance some data went LanFree while some went LAN?? .. and what significance is the fact that the BYTECOUNT increases slowly while waiting for a mediamount, but it doesn't when the backup performs well? Puzzled; Matthew. Computer says 'No'.. ___________________________ Disclaimer Notice __________________________ This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read by those to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact us, delete the message from your computer and destroy any copies. Any distribution or copying without our prior permission is prohibited. Internet communications are not always secure and therefore Powergen Retail Limited does not accept legal responsibility for this message. The recipient is responsible for verifying its authenticity before acting on the contents. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Powergen Retail Limited. Registered addresses: Powergen Retail Limited, Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park, Coventry, CV4 8LG. Registered in England and Wales No: 3407430 Telephone +44 (0) 2476 42 4000 Fax +44 (0) 2476 42 5432
