Oh, how I love quoting directly from IBM manuals:

"If the value falls below 98%, consider increasing the size of the
database buffer pool. For larger installations, performance could
imporve significantly if your cache hit percentage is greater than 99%."

--Page 396, TSM V5.1 Administrators Guide for AIX

Memory is so cheap that you can afford to throw lots of it at it.

Roger Deschner      University of Illinois at Chicago     [EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Dwight McCann wrote:

>Roger,
>
>I really enjoyed and appreciated your response on this issue, but you've
>got me to wondering at bit.  I'm running TSM 5.1.8 on Win2K with 2G
>RAM.  I looked at my migration times which are about 20 minutes (so
>that's no problem) and then did the Q DB F=D and saw that my Cache Hit
>was only 96.81.  You said that if it wasn't 99% it needed help.  I have
>it autotuning and here are my outputs:
>
>tsm: DATAPLUS_SERVER1>q actlog begind=-2 search='expiration'
>
>Date/Time                Message
>--------------------
>----------------------------------------------------------
>01/13/2004 19:19:22      ANR0984I Process 177 for EXPIRATION started in the
>                          BACKGROUND at 19:19:22.
>01/13/2004 19:19:22      ANR0811I Inventory client file expiration
>started as
>                          process 177.
>01/13/2004 19:37:58      ANR0812I Inventory file expiration process 177
>completed:
>                          examined 437237 objects, deleting 87348 backup
>objects, 0
>                          archive objects, 0 DB backup volumes, and 0
>recovery plan
>                          files. 0 errors were encountered.
>01/13/2004 19:37:58      ANR0987I Process 177 for EXPIRATION running in the
>                          BACKGROUND processed 87348 items with a
>completion state
>                          of SUCCESS at 19:37:58.
>01/14/2004 19:37:58      ANR0984I Process 182 for EXPIRATION started in the
>                          BACKGROUND at 19:37:58.
>01/14/2004 19:37:58      ANR0811I Inventory client file expiration
>started as
>                          process 182.
>01/14/2004 19:58:20      ANR0812I Inventory file expiration process 182
>completed:
>                          examined 433897 objects, deleting 104134
>backup objects,
>                          0 archive objects, 0 DB backup volumes, and 0
>recovery
>                          plan files. 0 errors were encountered.
>01/14/2004 19:58:20      ANR0987I Process 182 for EXPIRATION running in the
>                          BACKGROUND processed 104134 items with a
>completion state
>                          of SUCCESS at 19:58:20.
>01/15/2004 09:43:06      ANR2017I Administrator DWIGHT issued command:
>QUERY ACTLOG
>                          begind=-2 search=expiration
>
>tsm: DATAPLUS_SERVER1>q db f=d
>
>          Available Space (MB): 30,000
>        Assigned Capacity (MB): 25,292
>        Maximum Extension (MB): 4,708
>        Maximum Reduction (MB): 19,564
>             Page Size (bytes): 4,096
>            Total Usable Pages: 6,474,752
>                    Used Pages: 1,442,366
>                      Pct Util: 22.3
>                 Max. Pct Util: 22.7
>              Physical Volumes: 2
>             Buffer Pool Pages: 32,768
>         Total Buffer Requests: 28,394,716
>                Cache Hit Pct.: 96.81
>               Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00
>           Backup in Progress?: No
>    Type of Backup In Progress:
>  Incrementals Since Last Full: 4
>Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 0.98
>            Percentage Changed: 0.02
>Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 01/15/2004 05:45:26
>
>Is there something I should do to get the cache hits up to 99% even
>though I don't yet have a performance issue?  I realize that my
>environment is quite small but it is about to double and I'd rather be
>proactive.  TIA,
>
>--
>Dwight McCann
>Computer and Network Technologist, UCSB Info Systems & Computing
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://borg.isc.ucsb.edu/dmm/  - office: 805-893-3113
>
>

Reply via email to