Sorry to bother you again. I mentioned the small file/directory file speedups here as a reason to upgrade, but I cannot find the APAR that appears to fix that. Do you know the APAR number for that fix so I can read the text? Thanks.
Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_ Senior Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ BJC Health Care |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_) Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Wheelock, Michael D wrote: > Hi, > > Not that I am aware of if you are currently patched up in 5.1. The one > speed increase I saw was the speedup of the cached disk pool with small > files (ie. For directory info to a separate diskpool, etc). That is > available in a patch to 5.1 as well. We went to 5.2 for many reasons, not > the least of which was full support of our windows 2003 active directory > systems (and soon our exchange 2003 systems). Additionally, 5.2 is > supported on AIX 5.2 (which due to the fastt) was our os version of choice. > > Michael Wheelock > Integris Health > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 9:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: TSM v5.2 on AIX > > > Are you saying there are significant speed increases in 5.2? Thanks for the > info! > > Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_ > Senior Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ > BJC Health Care |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' > St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_) > Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html > > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Wheelock, Michael D wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have been running 5.2.0.0 on AIX 5.2ML1 for quite a while now (3-4 > > months) with no significant issues. Everything works well and is very > > speedy. We decided on 5.2 because we were using fastt products for > > disk storage and can dynamically increase their size (well it requires > > a down...so it is loose versions of the word dynamic). I am getting > > ready to go to 5.2.0.2 (I have been out for a couple of weeks) but > > have not yet. Most of my clients (ie. Everything but the nt4 and aix > > 4.3.3 clients) are at 5.2.x.x. > > > > Michael Wheelock > > Integris Health of Oklahoma > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:53 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: TSM v5.2 on AIX > > > > > > Thanks - I didn't realize those levels were on the ftp server. > > > > > > Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_ > > Senior Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ > > BJC Health Care |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' > > St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_) > > Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html > > > > > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Ochs, Duane wrote: > > > > > Haven't used it, but here is the link to 5.1.7.0 > > > > > > ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/mainten > > > an > > > ce/ser > > > ver/v5r1/AIX/LATEST/ > > > > > > Patches. > > > > > > ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches > > > /s > > > erver/ > > > AIX/ > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:41 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: TSM v5.2 on AIX > > > > > > > > > What experiences have you had with V5.2, on AIX if possible? Was it > > > 5.2.01 or 5.2.0.2? TSM support recommended going to 5.1.7.2, but I > > > don't have the 5.1.7.0 media, but I have 5 copies of 5.2.0, so I was > > > thinking about doing that instead. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_ > > > Senior Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ > > > BJC Health Care |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' > > > St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_) > > > Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html > > > > > This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is > > subject to protection under state and federal law. This information is > > intended to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are > > not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, > > distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited > > and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic > > transmission in error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail > > (reply). > > > This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to protection > under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the use of the > individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is > prohibited > and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in > error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply). >
