It's always been this way. When you register a node, it creates an 
administrative user account for the node:

 "When a new node is registered, an administrative user ID is automatically created 
for the node. By default, this node has client owner authority."

        So on the GUI, you can connect to the TSM server as the node and the node's 
TSM password.

        I'm not sure why you were not able to connect as that node. Do a "q admin" and 
see if that node is listed. See if that admin account is locked. Perhaps reset that 
admin password.

        Really, it looks like nothing should have changed.

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Flemming Hougaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NetWare Client 5.2 and Webinterface


Hi

I have been looking over the new ITSM Client for NetWare version 5.2.0.0... and I'm 
properly going to get an massive headache ;o)

I installed the client on a testserver, and tried to log in with the appropriate 
credentials belonging to the node it self - it failed?? I tried an administrator 
account - succes!! Then I turned to the documentation (typical everything has to crash 
and burn before using this ;o) ), and i quote:



*       If you plan to use a Web client, you must have an administrative user ID with 
system privilege, policy privilege, client access authority, or client owner 
authority. When a new node is registered, an administrative user ID is automatically 
created for the node. By default, this node has client owner authority.

And now I'm a bit puzzled... Why???? I have a lot of servers on remote sites, and have 
never created the default user ID - there is no need to! the client have always been 
able to log in with the according nodename and password! Why change this? I like the 
fact, that my user accounts is minimized to a minimum but with this new client you 
will need to create the account every time - and worse, I have to create an account 
every time I want to upgrade?
 
So anyone... Why have this been done? any good reasons? any suggestions to why?
 
Regards
Flemming

Reply via email to