Matt, In my shop, we do full backups of the TSM database. That is because the TSM database will fit on one tape. When the TSM database span across two tapes, then we will be thinking about doing incremental backup of the database. Keep in mind that you can only do so many incremental backup of the database. Once you reach that limit, a full backup of the database need to be done.
If TSM was doing a full backup twice a day. I would suspect, the reason on why two backups are done is to keep the recovery log from over committing. That is if TSM is in rollforward mode. Must be nice to have a remote disaster recovery site that is less than a 5-minute walk. ;) Sias ________________________________________________ Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag ---- On , Matt Simpson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I'm curious about the type and frequency of database backups that > people do. I've inherited a TSM environment set up by sombeody else > and I'm trying to make sense out of it. > > The original setup did two backups every day, a full and a snapshot. > The full stayed onsite and the snapshot went offsite. (We use DRM, > and the MOVE DRM * SOURCE=DBS sent the snapshot offsite and left the > full alone). That seemed like overkill, so I changed the "onsite" > backup to do a full backup on Sunday and an incremental other days. > But at two hours for a full backup, and almost as long for an > incremental, I'm wondering if we're still spending more time than > necessary backing up our database. Does anybody else see the need > for two daily backups? I think the likeliihood of a disaster > requiring a database restore is so slim that a single offsite copy > might be enough, especially since our "offsite vault" is less than a > 5-minute walk (which raises another issue, but thats what we're > living with). > > Does anybody mess with full/incremental database backups? Or, if I'm > only going to do one backup a day, would it make more sense to do a > full every day, to simplify things if I do have a disaster and need > to restore? > -- > > > Matt Simpson -- OS/390 Support > 219 McVey Hall -- (859) 257-2900 x300 > University Of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > mainframe -- An obsolete device still used by thousands of obsolete > companies serving billions of obsolete customers and making huge obsolete > profits for their obsolete shareholders. And this year's run twice as fast > as last year's. > >