Hi I believe Paul is right, but if you want to check for data in copypool, and not in primary pool, do a restore stgpool "primarypool" preview=yes. It should tell you if there are data in the copypool which are not in primarypool. It also tells you which tapes you need to really perform the restore of the primary pool (if you want to do it -preview=no). Just my 2 cents...
Rgds. Geirr G. Halvorsen -----Original Message----- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10. februar 2003 20:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Occupancy from copy_pool > primary_pool ?? I think any aggregates that have deleted files in them are still counted as whole. So, if reclamation ever runs against the primary and any copy pools it is highly likely some aggregates in one pool would be reclaimed and in others they may not. The other possibility is you have more than one primary pool which has had a backup stgpool command to the copy pool. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Northrop Grumman Information Technology 757-688-8180 -----Original Message----- From: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Occupancy from copy_pool > primary_pool ?? Hi* SM'ers, Could anybody explain me how it is possible that following query : "select sum (physical_mb), sum (logical_mb), stgpool_name from occupancy group by stgpool_name" shows me copy-pools occupation bigger than primary pools ? I first thought it could be related to space reclamation process, but when I ran that query all reclamation processes where allready finished (same thresholds for both primary and copy pools), so I'm stuck :-( Anybody willing to shed some light on me ? Thanks in advance. Arnaud =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group | | Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland | | Phone: +41 61 226 19 78 / Fax: +41 61 226 17 01 | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
