You have got one point. Yes, I did the mistake of having ntuser.dat it excluded, although I should have known better. But I have had usrclass.dat included.
Maybe this inconsistency explains why I see empty fonts list in winword know - but I still can use any font if I type it´s name correctly in.. But it is OK - since it is windows I will have a look into manuals that are installed along with the system and with winword and I will figure out how fonts are bound to applications and correct this manually ;=8) thanks Juraj -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Jänner 2003 12:12 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: activate registry keys with 5.1.5.7 client ? I would bet the restore went fine and *everything* backed up was restored. The trap is "backed up" - have you backed up those NTUSER.DAT files!?! That's the place those customizations reside. Look at the Wanda Prather's post titled "Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????" from 12.02.2002. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Salak Juraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 30.01.2003 10:35 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: activate registry keys with 5.1.5.7 client ? hello all, I performed recently BMR recovery of W2k prof., procedure taken from older redbook "Deploying the tivoli storage manager client in a windows 2000 environment". This procedure used to work for me well with older TSM clients, but now following happend: After restoring of System Object i was NOT offered an option to activate registry keys. Consequently, the restored system worked but was far from perfect (many user settings missing) Is there any known change in later TSM clients regarding to restore of System Objects in latest TSM clients? regards Juraj Salak
