Here is what that command gives me.
dsmc q inclexcl
ANS1138E The 'QUERY' command must be followed by a subcommand
-----Original Message-----
From: Kai Hintze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exclude options
Hmmm..., I pulled exclude.fs out of the documentation, but it was 4.2 doco,
so I would have thought it would work. Do you have anything in you
dsmerror.log about the excludes? What does "dsmc q inclexcl" tell you?
"exclude /.../u01/.../*" will certainly avoid backing up the files under
/u01, but it will still examine each file in the file system to see if it
should be backed up. The trees I want to avoid generally are structured
/db
/db/database1
/db/database1/d01
/db/database1/d02
/db/database1/d03
/db/database2
/db/database2/d01
/db/database2/d02
/db/database2/d03
where each d0? is a separate file system, and new branches can be added
without warning. That being the case I generally "exclude.dir /db". That way
I get notices for each file system that it is excluded but the client
doesn't spend lots of time traversing the trees. And I don't get burned if
someone adds another filesystem to the tree and forgets to tell me.
Luck!
- Kai.
The reason most people fail instead of succeed is that they trade what they
want most for what they want at the moment. Don't make failure a priority!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrews, Bert A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 27 January 2003 7:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Exclude options
>
>
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Poster: "Andrews, Bert A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Exclude options
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
>
> Kai, We are 4.1 and it looks the /.../u01/.../* works for
> this version. If
> we use the exclude.fs /u02/* this will still backup
> everything. I think
> that if we upgrade to a higher level like version 5 maybe
> this will go away.
> Any Suggestions?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Bert Andrews
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kai Hintze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 5:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Exclude options
>
>
> You don't say which version of TSM you are using, but if it
> is anywhere near
> recent, and you want to exclude the entire file system then I
> would say
> exclude.fs /u01
> exclude.fs /u02
> ...
>
> Have fun!
> Kai.
>
>
> "Nobody ever lay on their deathbed saying, 'Gee! I wish I had
> spent more
> time at the office.'" -- Linda Ellerbee
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrews, Bert A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, 24 January 2003 12:55 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Exclude options
> >
> >
> > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> > -----------------------
> > Sender: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Poster: "Andrews, Bert A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Exclude options
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----------------
> >
> > is this the right syntax for excluding a filesystem?
> >
> > exclude /.../unix/../
> > exclude /.../core/../
> > exclude /.../.SpaceMan/.../*
> > exclude.fs /.../u01/.../*
> > exclude.fs /.../u02/.../*
> > exclude.fs /.../u03/.../
> > exclude.fs /.../u04/.../*
> >
> > OR
> > should we use the:
> >
> >
> > exclude.dir /u01/*
> > exclude.dir /u02/*
> > exclude.dir /u03/*
> > exclude.dir /u04/*
> >
> > The mounted filesystems are :
> >
> > /dev/u01lv 15466496 10011152 36% 860 1% /u01
> > /dev/u02lv 15597568 13718904 13% 2498 2% /u02
> > /dev/u03lv 15597568 5892928 63% 478 1% /u03
> > /dev/u04lv 15466496 8779884 44% 6218 3% /u04
> >
>
