Del, thank you for the information. Turns out my disk storagepool is smaller than the database; that's why it went directly to tape. I don't have much disk space on my TSM server, but it's probably best to send it right to tape.
Thanks again, Neil On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 18:54, Del Hoobler wrote: > Neil, > > An Exchange backup consists of one large object > that contains the database files and the > associated logs. > > A few things that would force it directly to tape are: > > 1.) If there is not enough storage space in the disk > storagepool to contain the entire backup. > > 2.) If you have a MAXFILESIZE parameter on the > STORAGEPOOL so that backup object that is > larger than a certain size, will go directly > to tape. > > 3.) A management class that sends the backups > directly to a tape storagepool. > > Many customers choose number 2 or 3 above > for large database backups (like Exchange or SQL) > so that their disk pool does not get overloaded > for a single database backup. > > Look into the things above to see if they > might be causing this. > > Thanks, > > Del > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Del Hoobler > IBM Corporation > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - Never cut what can be untied. > - Commit yourself to constant improvement. > ======================================================================== > > > Thank you, Exchange appears to be backing up right now. Strange, > > though, all my other backups go to the backuppool on my TSM server's > > disk, and get flushed from there to tape. The Exchange backup is going > > directly to tape (I can see the tape writing while the backup is going). > > Is there a setting to make this backup go to the same route, or is the > > backup direct to tape for some purpose I'm not aware of? -- Neil Dombrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>