Onsite reclamation is a volume at a time. Setting the RECLAIM=100 will not
stop the current reclamation PROCESS, but will prevent any more from
starting. Unless you cancel the process, TSM will finish reclaming the
current volume.

Offsite reclamation is a single process for ALL tape volumes to be
reclaimed. Setting the RECLAIM=100 will only stop future reclamation tasks
from starting. THe current reclamation  process will run until it's
finished. It doesn't stop just because you set the RECLAIM back to 100%. You
need to cancel the process to stop reclamation that is currently running.
There is no duration setting...it runs until its done or you cancel it.

Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Coats, Jack
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Migration Etc.


this is kind of what I am fighting. ... but to automate reclaiming tapepool
tapes, we have an administrative schedule that issues

        set stg tapepool rec=5

and another command to later do

        set stg tapepool rec=100

to stop it.  We do this for both the tapepool and copypool.  Right now my
problem is the copypool takes a long time and is very slow.

You can issue these by hand to get reclamation started.

... LOLuck ... JC

-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Migration Etc.


For some reason this week TSM decided to quit migrating data (at least it
appears that way) for the tapepool to copypool.  As a result I'm only
getting 1
to 4 ejects today and needless to say I'm running short of scratch tapes and
have backups failing.

I have the following settings:

diskpool  hi=100    lo=60
tapepool  hi=90     lo=70

The only way I can try and stay up with backups is to run move data on
tapepool
and free tapes up so they become scratch tapes again.  I don't know if this
is
enough data, but if anyone has any ideas I'd appreciate it.

Thanks,

Gene

Reply via email to