No, this is just copypools, up to two. I agree with you, and we put in a requirement at Share to do something like this, with one copy going to primary and one copy to copypool, but this was during migrate. I won't be able to take advantage of the copypools in the way that it was added, because of the tape drive per session requirement.
Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_) Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, MC Matt Cooper (2838) wrote: > Can it be used to do both a MIGRATE and a COPY? Ie, as it moves from disk > to tape, it is also writing to a 2nd tape that is a part of the COPYPOOL > which will go offsite? That would make it more in line with other > mainframe copy products. Dual write, one for onsite and one for offsite. > Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: TSM 5.1 > > #2 is not the panacea that it sounds like. The dual writes to the > copypool's happens during session data transfer to disk pool - thus, you > must have a tape drive per session doing the dual write. > > Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ > BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' > St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_) > Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Richard L. Rhodes wrote: > > > We had a meeting with IBM last week where they described some of the > > new features of 5.1 - coming within a few weeks. > > > > 1) multi session restore > > 2) simultaneous writes to copy pools (more than one) > > 3) a "move nodedata" command > > 4) lan-free backup/restore (I thought it already had this) > > 5) hpux lan-free > > >
