Hi,
we had the same problem in our WinNT (file-server Intel Pentium pro 2*200MHz)
environment,
but the problem was located in the LAN.
In the end the switches to our HOST (OS/390) were to slow for the traffic.
Since we use the OSA-channel to store to our TSM-Servers in OS/390, the aggregate
network rate is
at 650kb/s - 1,6MB/s!
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Nuremberg - Germany
Alex Paschal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Freitag, 8. März 2002, 19:48:41, CET):
> Demetrius, you beat me to it.
>
> To be exact, we've found that having Scan Outbound Files checked in McAfee
> really slowed down the scan. Letting McAfee stay up with Scan Outbound
> Files disabled resolved our problem.
>
> Alex Paschal
> Storage Administrator
> Freightliner, LLC
> (503) 745-6850 phone/vmail
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Malbrough, Demetrius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client (
> takes 8 ho urs)
>
>
> Make sure you are not running your ANTI-VIRUS Software (McAfee) during the
> nightly incrementals!!!!!!!!
>
> -Demetrius
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client
> (takes 8 ho urs)
>
>
> Total time taken 7hrs does not mean to xfer 818mb it took 7hrs with
> 11mb/sec.
> Was this in que.I have NT,hp,aix clients WITH MORE THAN THESE objects in
> 3.7.3
> But all is ok .
> I think it was in que or ur n/w packets are dropped.
> Look for these.This is what my thought says.
> Balanand
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Poetzsch,Robert E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client (takes 8
> ho urs)
>
>
> Here is my recent sched.log file showing almost 8 hours to process 279,057
> objects.
>
> I'm thinking that someone has some insight on how to "Optimize" a Windows
> client for more efficient nightly backups. Also, there is an error message
> about TCP/IP connection failure; which I believe is related to our dsm.opt
> configuration due to a "time-out" condition.
>
> The FS4500 Client is using "Windows 2000 Server" OS and TSM 3.7.1 Client,
> but we will soon upgrade to TSM version 4.2.1 to see if this helps.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Bob Poetzsch
> Tivoli Storage Manager - System Administrator
> UCONN Health Center
> Farmington, CT 06030-5205
> ___________________________________________________________________
> 03/08/2002 05:34:46 Successful incremental backup of '\\fs4500\e$'
>
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Server Version 3, Release 7, Level 1.0
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Data compression forced off by the server
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Server date/time: 03/08/2002 05:32:23 Last access:
> 03/07/2002 21:41:48
>
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects inspected: 279,057
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects backed up: 1,805
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects updated: 1
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects rebound: 0
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects deleted: 37,519
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects failed: 0
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of bytes transferred: 818.24 MB
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Data transfer time: 73.79 sec
> 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Network data transfer rate: 11,353.75 KB/sec
> 03/08/2002 05:34:48 Aggregate data transfer rate: 29.56 KB/sec
> 03/08/2002 05:34:48 Objects compressed by: 0%
> 03/08/2002 05:34:48 Elapsed processing time: 07:52:15
> 03/08/2002 05:34:48 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END
>
> 03/08/2002 05:34:48 ANS1017E Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure
>
