You can do move data on them if you want. Kelly J. Lipp Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. PO Box 51313 Colorado Springs, CO 80949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.storsol.com or www.storserver.com (719)531-5926 Fax: (240)539-7175
-----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lawrence Clark Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Copypool reclamation That's true, but with more interest in hands off operation, some sites are now storing the copypool volumes in separate libraries in different locations. TSM should at least provide for the option of choosing to use the primary storage pool or the copypool volume as the source for reclamation. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/10/02 01:46PM >>> Very often, the copy pool volumes are off site volumes. It would be quite impractical to reclaim these volumes. By doing reclamation from the on-site primary pool, you do not have to return the off-site volumes in order to do reclamation. Alan Davenport Senior Storage Administrator Selective Insurance [EMAIL PROTECTED] (973) 948-1306 -----Original Message----- From: Lawrence Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Copypool reclamation Can any explain to me the reasoning behind having the valid data from a reclamation on a copypool volume having to be obtained from the primary storage pool? It seems to me that it would be much more efficient to copy the valid data directly from the copypool volume being reclaimed to the target copypool volume.
