Hello and thanks! I only have hands-on knowledge with DLT and DAT (on TSM) and the differencies are immense.
Restore from an aged file system (this means: files having been changed often and backuped daily for months) from DLT is as slow as 2 Gb per hour, restore from DAT is about 6 GB per hour. But DAT�s are not reliable at all. With LTO I await about 5GB per hour, wit AIT I hoped for more, untill you wrote me.. regards Juraj Salak -----Original Message----- From: Michel David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 10:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: anybody out there using AIT library? We use here AIT2 and AIT1 library. Also API using and Migration Backup take (at least) 8 times more than it's written in the manual. Our configuation: Qualstar (3-4 different sorts) 3.7.4 NT4.0 sp6 Good luck. If you success to make it run only 1/2 than they say so please tell us !! Michel DAVID MARNET ISRAEL --- Salak Juraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have offerts for 3575, LTO and AIT-3 / Qualstar > libraries > ( AIT-2 available, AIT-3 coming soon) > but have only paper-based knowledges about AIT. > > Weighted Time-to-data performance, capacity and > price ratio > seems to be far the best with AIT for my needs, > but I have no experiencies with this technology at > all. > > Any suggestions? > > Juraj Salak > Asamer Familienholding G M B H > EDV > Unterthalhamstra_e 2 > A-4694 Ohlsdorf > Vsterreich > www.asamer.at > > B|ro: +43 7612 799 529 > Mobil: +43 664 528 6474 > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com
