check to see what the port on the switch is set to. It might be set to
auto-negotiate.
just a thought...
Marc Levitan
Storage Manager
PFPC Global Fund Services
Rob Schroeder
<robs@FAMOUSFOO To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TWEAR.COM> cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: performance question
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ST.EDU>
10/01/2001
12:27 PM
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
I have turned compression off, but to no avail. The network card is not
set to auto-negotiate, and all the settings are verified and correct. Both
machines are well oversized with 512 MB of memory and dual processors that
are not being used anything but marginally. Any other ideas?
Rob Schroeder
Famous Footwear
"PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 09/28/2001
06:14:52 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: performance question
Rob look at this o/p.I have only 100mbs/sec NIC Card.We also have fast
switches.
It should atleast give u 8mbs/sec network xfer rate.I do with
compression=yes on client side.
Try to do backup at some other time and see the throughput.
This is Unix client but of MIDRANGE.
09/28/01 09:59:17 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN
09/28/01 09:59:17 Total number of objects inspected: 62,218
09/28/01 09:59:17 Total number of objects backed up: 361
09/28/01 09:59:17 Total number of objects updated: 0
09/28/01 09:59:17 Total number of objects rebound: 0
09/28/01 09:59:17 Total number of objects deleted: 0
09/28/01 09:59:17 Total number of objects expired: 81
09/28/01 09:59:17 Total number of objects failed: 0
09/28/01 09:59:17 Total number of bytes transferred: 293.13 MB
09/28/01 09:59:17 Data transfer time: 3.15 sec
09/28/01 09:59:17 Network data transfer rate: 95,162.04 KB/sec
09/28/01 09:59:17 Aggregate data transfer rate: 763.10 KB/sec
09/28/01 09:59:17 Objects compressed by: 90%
09/28/01 09:59:17 Elapsed processing time: 00:06:33
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: performance question
I am running TSM client 3.7.2 on a Win2000 server with Service pack 2. The
TSM server is Win2000 SP2 and using TSM 4.1.3. I realize I need to upgrade
the client, but I that will not happen until next week. My dilemma is
this: the server backs up to the TSM server directly to a DISK pool that is
quite large, the network is Gigabit, and this client is the only client
that is talking to the server. There are no other applications running on
either server. I would expect this baby to scream, but instead it is
dogging. I am getting just 2 MB/sec throughput and would expect to be
pushing the network. Here is the options file I am using:
LANG AMENG
tcpserveraddress fftsm01
changingretries 0
resourceutilization 10
schedlogretention 10
errorlogretention 10
compression yes
txnbytelimit 25600
largecommbuffers yes
tcpnodelay yes
compressalways no
tcpbuffsize 256
tcpwindowsize 50
Any ideas?
Rob Schroeder
Famous Footwear
