I will need to translate to English but I gather it is talking about the
RESOURCEUTILZATION / MAXNUMMP values.  While we have increased MAXNUMMP to
5 on the server (will try going higher),  not sure how much good it would
do since the backup schedule uses OBJECTS to point to a specific/single
mountpoint/filesystem (see below) but is worth trying to bump the
RESOURCEUTILIZATION value on the client even higher...

We have checked the dsminstr.log file and it is spending 92% of the time in
PROCESS DIRS (no surprise)

7:46:25 AM   SUN : q schedule * ISILON-SOM-SOMADFS1 f=d
            Policy Domain Name: DFS
                 Schedule Name: ISILON-SOM-SOMADFS1
                   Description: ISILON-SOM-SOMADFS1
                        Action: Incremental
                     Subaction:
                       Options: -subdir=yes
                       Objects: \\rams.adp.vcu.edu\SOM\TSM\SOMADFS1\*
                      Priority: 5
               Start Date/Time: 12/05/2017 08:30:00
                      Duration: 1 Hour(s)
    Maximum Run Time (Minutes): 0
                Schedule Style: Enhanced
                        Period:
                   Day of Week: Any
                         Month: Any
                  Day of Month: Any
                 Week of Month: Any
                    Expiration:
Last Update by (administrator): ZFORRAY
         Last Update Date/Time: 01/12/2018 10:30:48
              Managing profile:


On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 4:06 AM Jansen, Jonas <jan...@itc.rwth-aachen.de>
wrote:

> It is possible to da a parallel backup of file system parts.
> https://www.gwdg.de/documents/20182/27257/GN_11-2016_www.pdf (german)
> have a
> look on page 10.
>
> ---
> Jonas Jansen
>
> IT Center
> Gruppe: Server & Storage
> Abteilung: Systeme & Betrieb
> RWTH Aachen University
> Seffenter Weg 23
> 52074 Aachen
> Tel: +49 241 80-28784
> Fax: +49 241 80-22134
> jan...@itc.rwth-aachen.de
> www.itc.rwth-aachen.de
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> On Behalf Of Del
> Hoobler
> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 3:29 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Looking for suggestions to deal with large backups
> not
> completing in 24-hours
>
> They are a 3rd-party partner that offers an integrated Spectrum Protect
> solution for large filer backups.
>
>
> Del
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 07/09/2018
> 09:17:06 AM:
>
> > From: Zoltan Forray <zfor...@vcu.edu>
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Date: 07/09/2018 09:17 AM
> > Subject: Re: Looking for suggestions to deal with large backups not
> > completing in 24-hours
> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> >
> > Thanks Del.  Very interesting.  Are they a VAR for IBM?
> >
> > Not sure if it would work in the current configuration we are using to
> back
> > up ISILON. I have passed the info on.
> >
> > BTW, FWIW, when I copied/pasted the info, Chrome spell-checker
> red-flagged
> > on "The easy way to incrementally backup billons of objects" (billions).
> > So if you know anybody at the company, please pass it on to them.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:51 AM Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Another possible idea is to look at General Storage dsmISI MAGS:
> > >
> > >         INVALID URI REMOVED
> >
>
> u=http-3A__www.general-2Dstorage.com_PRODUCTS_products.html&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_ia
> SHvJObTbx-
> >
>
> siA1ZOg&r=0hq2JX5c3TEZNriHEs7Zf7HrkY2fNtONOrEOM8Txvk8&m=ofZM7gZ7p5GL1HFyHU75
> lwUZLmc_kYAQxroVCZQUCSs&s=25_psxEcE0fvxruxybvMJZzSZv-
> > ach7r-VHXaLNVD_E&e=
> > >
> > >
> > > Del
> > >
> > >
> > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 07/05/2018
> > > 02:52:27 PM:
> > >
> > > > From: Zoltan Forray <zfor...@vcu.edu>
> > > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > > > Date: 07/05/2018 02:53 PM
> > > > Subject: Looking for suggestions to deal with large backups not
> > > > completing in 24-hours
> > > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> > > >
> > > > As I have mentioned in the past, we have gone through large
> migrations
> > > to
> > > > DFS based storage on EMC ISILON hardware.  As you may recall, we
> backup
> > > > these DFS mounts (about 90 at last count) using multiple Windows
> servers
> > > > that run multiple ISP nodes (about 30-each) and they access each DFS
> > > > mount/filesystem via -object=\\rams.adp.vcu.edu\departmentname.
> > > >
> > > > This has lead to lots of performance issue with backups and some
> > > > departments are now complain that their backups are running into
> > > > multiple-days in some cases.
> > > >
> > > > One such case in a department with 2-nodes with over 30-million
> objects
> > > for
> > > > each node.  In the past, their backups were able to finish quicker
> since
> > > > they were accessed via dedicated servers and were able to use
> Journaling
> > > to
> > > > reduce the scan times.  Unless things have changed, I believe
> Journling
> > > is
> > > > not an option due to how the files are accessed.
> > > >
> > > > FWIW, average backups are usually <50k files and <200GB once it
> finished
> > > > scanning.....
> > > >
> > > > Also, the idea of HSM/SPACEMANAGEMENT has reared its ugly head since
> > > many
> > > > of these objects haven't been accessed in many years old. But as I
> > > > understand it, that won't work either given our current
> configuration.
> > > >
> > > > Given the current DFS configuration (previously CIFS), what can we
> do to
> > > > improve backup performance?
> > > >
> > > > So, any-and-all ideas are up for discussion.  There is even
> discussion
> > > on
> > > > replacing ISP/TSM due to these issues/limitations.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Zoltan Forray*
> > > > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
> > > > Xymon Monitor Administrator
> > > > VMware Administrator
> > > > Virginia Commonwealth University
> > > > UCC/Office of Technology Services
> > > > www.ucc.vcu.edu
> > > > zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
> > > > Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations
> will
> > > > never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
> > > > security number or confidential personal information. For more
> details
> > > > visit INVALID URI REMOVED
> > > > u=http-3A__phishing.vcu.edu_&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> > > > siA1ZOg&r=0hq2JX5c3TEZNriHEs7Zf7HrkY2fNtONOrEOM8Txvk8&m=5bz_TktY3-
> > > > a432oKYronO-w1z-
> > > > ax8md3tzFqX9nGxoU&s=EudIhVvfUVx4-5UmfJHaRUzHCd7Agwk3Pog8wmEEpdA&e=
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Zoltan Forray*
> > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
> > Xymon Monitor Administrator
> > VMware Administrator
> > Virginia Commonwealth University
> > UCC/Office of Technology Services
> > www.ucc.vcu.edu
> > zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
> > Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
> > never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
> > security number or confidential personal information. For more details
> > visit INVALID URI REMOVED
> > u=http-3A__phishing.vcu.edu_&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> >
>
> siA1ZOg&r=0hq2JX5c3TEZNriHEs7Zf7HrkY2fNtONOrEOM8Txvk8&m=ofZM7gZ7p5GL1HFyHU75
> lwUZLmc_kYAQxroVCZQUCSs&s=umTd28h-
> > GlxqSvNShsNIqm8D1PcanVk0HPcP5KTurKw&e=
> >
>


--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
VMware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/

Reply via email to