>I don't you can use cloud storage as a copypool That was supposed to be "I don't think you can use cloud storage as a copypool..."
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't you can use cloud storage as a copypool so that would mean you are > placing your primarypool in the cloud and limiting (in an extreme way) your > restore performance. > > It is fast enough for archival purposes (if you set it up correctly and > have enough of a local buffering pool and bandwith) and you can but backup > data in but getting backup data out fast enough to meet any serious SLA? > Hmm...I would look closely into that and start with a very small POC, > that's the thing with cloud storage, you can actually do that fairly easy. > > I wouldn't use cloud based storage for TSM for anything other than a > replacement for archive like data with a low retrieve rate. > > If you want to get rid of tape and not invest in setting up your own > offsite setup I'm sure there are plenty of electronic-vaulting solutions > like the ones we offer you can simply plug into. Just make sure your DR > plan is compatible with these solutions. It's can get complicated, it's all > connected. > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Michaud, Luc [Analyste principal - > environnement AIX] <luc.micha...@stm.info> wrote: > >> Greetings to you all, >> >> We've setup a blueprint replicated environment with directory container >> pools on both sides. >> >> We protect the primary node stgpools to tape as well, with offsite >> movements. >> >> Now we want to get rid of the tapes, most likely by leveraging AWS >> Glacier. >> >> We have been exposed to a limitation of containers only being able to >> have 1 container protection and 1 tape protection. >> >> How have you guys done it ? Any trick or caveat that we should be aware >> of ? >> >> Regards, >> >> Luc Michaud >> Société de Transport de Montréal >> >> >
