IBM Spectrum Protect Plus End to End Preview https://youtu.be/Zs6OhMLmu2Y <https://youtu.be/Zs6OhMLmu2Y> Efim
> 4 сент. 2017 г., в 11:50, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM > <eric-van.l...@klm.com> написал(а): > > Hi Stefan, > From what I have been reading SP Plus will be a software appliance, delivered > as an OVA file, which can be used as a stand-alone solution, but which also > should fit into an existing TSM/SP environment. From > https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/ibm-spectrum-protect-plus: "It can be > implemented as a stand-alone solution or integrate with your IBM Spectrum > Protect environment to off-load copies for long term storage and data > governance with scale and efficiency". > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > -----Original Message----- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Stefan Folkerts > Sent: zondag 3 september 2017 8:04 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started > > Steve, > > I don't think you should look at Spectrum Protect Plus as an improved > Spectrum Protect. > It's a totally different solution for a, for the most part, different > environment. > Spectrum Protect is an enterprise class catch-all backup & recovery solution, > Spectrum Protect Plus looks more to me like an entry-level vSphere/Hyper-V > point solution. > > That doesn't mean it doesn't have its place in the market, it does, but that > does mean that if you have a Spectrum Protect solution in place it would seem > a bit silly maybe, but then again, there are very few details released at > this point. > > > > On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Schaub, Steve <steve_sch...@bcbst.com> > wrote: > >> Just got back from VMWorld where IBM announced their new & improved SP >> product, I would hold off until you can check it out, much easier to >> deploy & manage. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf >> Of Stefan Folkerts >> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 1:06 PM >> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started >> >> Rick, >> >> I would run the 8.1.1 VE version if your vSphere stack supports it, >> the biggest improvements in my eyes above the 7.1 version are the >> restore performance that can go 5x in the right configuration (in my >> experience) and the tagging support (if you vShpere folder structure >> will work with it, but if not, you can always go for the classic scheduling >> method. >> The improved restore performance of 8.1.0+ has proven very important >> and it was good it came when it did because in previous versions it >> became a pretty big issue. >> 8.1+ VE on a 7.1 server should not be a problem in my experience. >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Ehresman,David E. < >> david.ehres...@louisville.edu> wrote: >> >>> It's been reported here that the restore time in the v8.1 CLIENT is >>> much improved over v7 so I would recommend that one for the client. >>> I am not sure the server version makes a difference for this situation. >>> >>> David Ehresman >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On >>> Behalf Of Rhodes, Richard L. >>> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 10:51 AM >>> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >>> Subject: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Up till now we have used BA clients in VM's. We would like to look >>> into implementing VE. I would appreciate any wisdom on bringing it >>> up first time. A specific question would be which version. Our >>> current TSM servers are v7.1.5, but I'm wondering if bringing up a >>> v8.1 server and VE would be best. >>> >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> ------------------ >>> >>> The information contained in this message is intended only for the >>> personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If >>> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent >>> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are >>> hereby notified that you have received this document in error and >>> that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this >>> message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >>> communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the >>> original message. >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of >> Tennessee E-mail disclaimer: >> http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm >> > ******************************************************** > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential > and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the > addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may > be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to > this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you > have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by > return e-mail, and delete this message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its > employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of > this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered > number 33014286 > ********************************************************
