Back in November you described this implementation, which makes a major reduction in the time required to do a DIRMC offsite copy reclamation: > DIRPOOL primary DISK: NEXTPOOL->DIRFILE > DIRFILE primary SEQUENTIAL on DISK > DIRCOPYPOOL copypool TAPE Would you mind posting the output from a: query stg DIRFILE format=detail and a: query devclass <device_class_name_from_query_stg> I'm assuming "SEQUENTIAL on DISK" means a device class type of FILE. But I want to be sure, before making the change.
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? Allen Barth
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? Richard Sims
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? arhoads
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? William Boyer
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? arhoads
- pct_utilized vs pct_reclaim Steve Bennett
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? France, Don G (Pace)
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? William Boyer
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? Joel Fuhrman
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? William Boyer
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? Joel Fuhrman
- Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only? France, Don G (Pace)