Ohhhhh might want to double check that statement...
last I checked it will not use to determine if the actual "archive" will
occur but it WILL (or used to) bind that file to any management class
specified...
example (last time I checked)
if you have the line in your inclexcl.list of
exclude /home/myid/testfile 10yrarch_mc
and you do something like
dsmc archive /home/myid/testfile
it will be bound to your/the 10yrarch_mc management class
haven't checked lately but my last test indicated the above statement is
(was) true
Dwight
-----Original Message-----
From: arhoads [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)
Gerrit,
Yes. Archive is not using the Include-Exclude list.
Steffan
Gerrit van Zyl wrote:
>
> Hi all TSM'ers,
>
> TSM Client 3.1.0.8 on NT
> TSM Server 3.1.2.58 on AIX
>
> I have the following scenario and hope someone can explain this to me.
> When archiving we get the following:
>
> 03/11/2001 03:54:57 ANE4952I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01) Total
> number of objects inspected: 461,739
> 03/11/2001 03:54:57 ANE4953I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01) Total
> number of objects archived: 411,368
>
> When we do a incremental backup we get the following:
>
> 03/12/2001 22:57:23 ANE4952I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01) Total
> number of objects inspected: 410,653
> 03/12/2001 22:57:23 ANE4954I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01) Total
> number of objects backed up: 3,414
>
> Why is there suce a huge difference between objects inspected in the two
> cases (50000 objects)? The files were not deleted!! This is the same
> everytime.
>
> Is archiving inspecting files differently than incremental backup?
>
> Thanks and regards.
> Gerrit van Zyl
>
> IT Consultant
> Faritec (Pty) Ltd
>
