After performing the command _q db f=d_ you will see a screen like this: Available Space (MB): 12,000 Assigned Capacity (MB): 12,000 Maximum Extension (MB): 0 Maximum Reduction (MB): 2,684 Page Size (bytes): 4,096 Total Usable Pages: 3,072,000 Used Pages: 2,377,010 Pct Util: 77.4 Max. Pct Util: 77.6 Physical Volumes: 12 Buffer Pool Pages: 32,768 Total Buffer Requests: 98,257,473 Cache Hit Pct.: 97.76 Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00 Backup in Progress?: No Type of Backup In Progress: Incrementals Since Last Full: 0 Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 191.43 Percentage Changed: 2.06 Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 02/14/01 07:01:06 Look at _Cache Hit Pct._ - it should be as high as possible, we were told 98% or better 99%. If it's too low you should increase the buffer pool. Reinhold Wagner, Zeuna Staerker GmbH & Co. KG
- Performance Large Files vs. Small Files Diana J.Cline
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... Thomas A. La Porte
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... arhoads
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... David Longo
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... Reinhold Wagner
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... Thomas Denier
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... Richard Sims
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... George Lesho
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... Richard Sims
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. S... Joe Faracchio
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... Prather, Wanda
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... Jeff Connor
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. Small... bbullock
- Re: Performance Large Files vs. S... Suad Musovich