HI David,
Yes, I have the same library in both sites, same drives, same kind and number of tapes.
Regards
Sergio
David Longo wrote:
> Do you have identical libraries in both locations? And identical models and number
>of drives in them and same model/type of tape media? How about the same number of
>tapes? These are some basic factors that can account for the difference.
>
> David B. Longo
> Systems Administrator
> Health First, Inc. I/T
> 3300 Fiske Blvd.
> Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
> PH 321.434.5536
> Pager 321.634.8230
> Fax: 321.434.5525
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/27/00 11:21AM >>>
> Hi all.
>
> I have two TSM servers installed in AIX 4.3 boxes with Sun libraries in
> different sites. In my HQ I take almost all the backups and I do a daily
> copy pool to the remote site.
>
> The local server (HQ) is TSM 3.7.2 and the remote one is 4.2.0.
>
> The problem is that my local backup pool has 2.7 TB of data while the
> remote pool has 3.7 TB. I expected a differential in the remote pool but
> 1TB (~30% more) seems to me too much for an overhead.
>
> Questions:
>
> How does TSM handle the expirations in a copy pool?
>
> It is normal the overhead that I'm seeing?
>
> If it is not, what can I do to reduce it?
>
> Thanks to all.
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Sergio R. Cherchyk
> Arquitectura Tecnol�gica - Midrange
> Banco R�o de la Plata S.A. - Grupo BSCH
> Mire 480, 2do piso - 1036 Cap. Fed.
> Argentina
> Tel. (054)-11-4341-1643
> Fax. (054)-11-4341-1264
> --------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------
Sergio R. Cherchyk
Arquitectura Tecnol�gica - Midrange
Banco R�o de la Plata S.A. - Grupo BSCH
Mire 480, 2do piso - 1036 Cap. Fed.
Argentina
Tel. (054)-11-4341-1643
Fax. (054)-11-4341-1264
--------------------------------------------
