Looks good to me. Thanks Angela and Antony!
*From: *Angela Dall'Ara <[email protected]>
*Date: *Tuesday, October 14, 2025 at 8:23 AM
*To: *"Wade, Clara" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
*Cc: *Policy Officer <[email protected]>, Antony Gollan <[email protected]>
*Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL] Revised IPv6 PI Assignment Policy
*CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender
and know the content is safe.
Hi Clara and Tobias,
Please review ASAP and let me know if you agree with the suggestions
made by my colleague Antony from the Comms dept and myself on your
proposal at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MWyk-I8xArAx3Bw5aghKQwY3dkKAMyhBKd63Azc9hzE/edit?usp=sharing
If you are fine with the suggestions, we can try to publish your new
version before the APWG session at RIPE 91.
In any case it will be very interesting for the WG to see in your
presentation the differences from the previous version
Looking forward to receiving your reply.
Thanks!
Angela
Angela Dall'Ara
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC
On 13/10/2025 20:21, Wade, Clara wrote:
Hi Angela,
Just checking in to confirm if we’re good to go.
Thanks,
Clara
*From: *"Wade, Clara" <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Date: *Wednesday, October 8, 2025 at 1:29 PM
*To: *Angela Dall'Ara <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Cc: *"[email protected]" <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>, Policy Officer
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [EXTERNAL] Revised IPv6 PI Assignment Policy
I confirm I agree with the waiver.
Thank you!
Clara
On Oct 8, 2025, at 00:48, Angela Dall'Ara <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
*CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the
organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless
you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Clara,
Many thanks for the doc, I already sent it over to Comms for
proofreading.
I will send you their comments/suggestions for yours and
Tobias' approval as soon as I receive them.
Meanwhile, could you please confirm that you agree with the
waiver below (Tobias already did it for version 1.0)?
/Any proposal will be used for contributing to the
formulation of the RIPE policies and will remain published on
the RIPE community website under the proposer’s name. A
proposal might be accepted or rejected by the RIPE community.
Proposers have the right to withdraw their proposal at any time./
/Provided that their proposals are accepted by the RIPE
community and the RIPE policies are amended accordingly,
proposers have the right to be mentioned as contributors to
the RIPE policies affected by their proposals./
/Any proposal and related contributions to the RIPE policies
are publicly available information for the use of the RIPE
community without any prior permission./
/Proposers cannot restrict public access to their proposals
or contribution to the RIPE policies, erase or amend them
without the consent of the RIPE community./
/You waive any economic right related to your proposal or
contribution to the RIPE policies and particularly any right
of demanding compensation from anyone that reproduces or
distributes your proposal/contribution in any way./
/You understand that your contribution might be amended or
erased by future RIPE policy changes./
Kind regards,
Angela
Angela Dall'Ara
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC
On 07/10/2025 23:12, Wade, Clara wrote:
Hi Angela,
Just the one proposal for now. I’d updated everything in
the Google Doc you shared, but here is a clean version if
it helps:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CKCXpKTEk58_AMlEDBbWnttLZ5lPgaFTVks8lahDpHc/edit?usp=sharing
Let me know if this looks okay to you or if you need
anything further.
Thank you,
Clara
*From: *Angela Dall'Ara <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Date: *Monday, October 6, 2025 at 6:47 AM
*To: *"[email protected]" <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>, "Wade,
Clara" <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Cc: *Policy Officer <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL] Revised IPv6 PI Assignment Policy
*CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the
organization. Do not click links or open attachments
unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is
safe.
Hi Clara and Tobias,
Apologies if I’m slow, from your conversation I do not
understand if you already agreed on presenting one
proposal or two.
FYI: In any case I need to receive a new version of the
proposal(s), including summary and rationale to
eventually proceed for coordinating proofread and publication
(https://www.ripe.net/community/policies/ripe-policy-proposal-template/).
Once I receive the new version, and as we are so close to
the start of RIPE 91, we can work on a best effort to
publish it before the APWG session otherwise we will do
it after the meeting.
Kind regards,
Angela
Angela Dall'Ara
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC
On 02/10/2025 09:13, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
Moin,
just gave it a read and lgtm; I also agree that the end site
proposal
has some time; Likely an EDI thing.
Concerning Pretalx: I could make the submission. However, given
that
you'll be the one on-site, it is probably better if you make the
submission, so you get speaker notes directly, and can upload
the
slides etc.
With best regards,
Tobias
On Wed, 2025-10-01 at 22:20 +0000, Wade, Clara wrote:
Hi all,
I just took a stab at editing the core policy proposal.
I’ve not had
time to work on the End Site definition spinoff proposal,
so would
suggest we focus on this one for RIPE 91.
@Tobias Fiebig<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> let me know your thoughts
and/or if you’re submitting this via Pretalx as Leo
suggested.
Thanks!
Clara
From: Angela Dall'Ara<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 at 6:14 AM
To: "Wade, Clara"<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Tobias Fiebig<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>, Policy
Officer<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Revised IPv6 PI Assignment Policy
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the
organization. Do
not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm
the sender
and know the content is safe.
Hi Clara,
The summer was great, I'm happy it's not over yet😉
Thank you for sharing the new version of the proposal.
I had a look at it and I tried to give you my thoughts is a
new
document ( I did not touch yours in case Tobias wanted to
work on it)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wqqPslfGwB0bjcNelGlgI-eVCgvFU1LVO-7uKR-YSKY/edit?usp=sharing
There
1) I included only the parts you suggested to keep
2) I highlighted the text changes in blue bold
3) I suggested to rearrange the content with all policy
text changes
the beginning and the explanations and considerations are
in the
Rationale.
This because some people told me they found the
proposal too long
and they were losing track of the proposed changes while
reading the
rest.
Some people also told me that explanations and
considerations
were supposed to be provided in the mailing list discussion
and not
in the proposal.
Personally, I would just list some of the stated
purposes and
considerations in the arguments in favour of the proposal,
avoiding
repetitions.
4) I made a couple of questions and comments
5) I added a suggestion for a separate policy proposal
regarding the
End Site Definition (missing the Rationale with arguments
in favour
and against)
Please let me know if something is not clear, I did my best
but you
never know, it was a busy day.
Important: You probably already know (and Tobias for sure)
that you
can happily discard any of the above, as the proposal is
owned by the
proposers not the by Policy Officer.
I will be back from vacation on 22 September, happy to have
a call
after that date if you think it could be useful.
Kind regards,
Angela
Angela Dall'Ara
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC
On 08/09/2025 17:56, Wade, Clara wrote:
Hi Angela,
Hope you’ve had a good summer!
I am writing to share a proposed new version of the
“Revised IPv6 PI
Assignment Policy” policy proposal 2024-01. Please see the
doc with
the suggested edits here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-JCouWaJcH66LAPifHLA3zLCgy2IlvBtIn7m7BuxSr8/edit?tab=t.0
The overarching intention of the proposed changes is to
shorten the
policy proposal to what is needed and to the core concepts
that the
community seems to agree need changing. In short, these are
the
proposed changes:
1. Spinning off the definition of End Site (2.9) into a
separate
proposal as that seemed like a point of contention that was
deviating
the discussion from the rest of the policy.
2. Removing the more detailed clarifications in 7.1
(and removing
7.1.3 altogether), understanding that the NCC’s
implementation would
follow these principles and they perhaps do not need to be
made
explicit in the policy.
We would appreciate hearing your thoughts on these.
Thank you,
Clara
